IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v10y2018i11p105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Perceptions of Patient Copayment on the Reported Adherence to Prescription Medication

Author

Listed:
  • Velisha A. Perumal-Pillay
  • Shiraz R. Alli
  • Fatima Suleman

Abstract

BACKGROUND- In South Africa, a large proportion of the population is dependent entirely on the publicly funded system for healthcare, while private funding covers only a small percentage of those who can afford to pay for health insurance or out-of-pocket payments. Non-compliance to medical treatment is a well-known problem and may lead to an increase in healthcare costs. OBJECTIVES- To investigate how the perception of prescription copayments influences medication use and the effect of this on safe and correct medicine usage METHODS- The study was conducted with a sample of patients from the Umbilo suburb of eThekwini, South Africa. Participants were members of a medical scheme and completed a questionnaire after informed consent. The questionnaire design included an eight-item scale to ascertain the degree of concern regarding prescription costs. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics; associations between household characteristics and outcomes were explored using odds ratios and chi square analysis. RESULTS- Overall 82% of the participants reported that prescription cost was a major factor that influenced medication collection. The association between demographic data and concern scale was assessed and revealed that participants had an increased concern with meeting prescription costs (OR 1.73, 95% CI 0.66-4.52). Most (93%) of the participants with a salary less than ZAR10 000 indicated a concern with prescription costs (chi square=21.7, df=2, p<0.05). CONCLUSION- The study indicated that prescription cost posed as a barrier to medication adherence as the copayment affected patients’ decisions to continue optimal treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Velisha A. Perumal-Pillay & Shiraz R. Alli & Fatima Suleman, 2018. "The Perceptions of Patient Copayment on the Reported Adherence to Prescription Medication," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(11), pages 105-105, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/37159/37320
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/37159
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timo R. Lambregts & René C. J. A. Vliet, 2018. "The impact of copayments on mental healthcare utilization: a natural experiment," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(6), pages 775-784, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berger, Michael & Six, Eva & Czypionka, Thomas, 2024. "Policy implications of heterogeneous demand reactions to changes in cost-sharing: Patient-level evidence from Austria," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    2. Berger, Michael & Six, Eva & Czypionka, Thomas, 2024. "Policy implications of heterogeneous demand reactions to changes in cost-sharing: patient-level evidence from Austria," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121162, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Lopes, Francisca Vargas & Riumallo Herl, Carlos J. & Mackenbach, Johan P. & Van Ourti, Tom, 2022. "Patient cost-sharing, mental health care and inequalities: A population-based natural experiment at the transition to adulthood," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    4. Rudy Douven & Minke Remmerswaal & Tobias Vervliet, 2019. "Treatment responses of mental health care providers after a demand shock," CPB Discussion Paper 404, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    5. Natalia Serna, 2021. "Cost sharing and the demand for health services in a regulated market," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1259-1275, June.
    6. Marie Kruse & Kim Rose Olsen & Christian Volmar Skovsgaard, 2022. "Co‐payment and adolescents' use of psychologist treatment: Spill over effects on mental health care and on suicide attempts," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(S2), pages 92-114, October.
    7. Michael Berger & Thomas Czypionka, 2021. "Regional medical practice variation in high-cost healthcare services," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(6), pages 917-929, August.
    8. Rudy Douven & Minke Remmerswaal & Tobias Vervliet, 2021. "Payment schemes and treatment responses after a demand shock in mental health care," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(12), pages 2956-2973, December.
    9. Berger, Michael & Czypionka, Thomas, 2021. "Regional medical practice variation in high-cost healthcare services: evidence from diagnostic imaging in Austria," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112952, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Rudy Douven & Minke Remmerswaal & Tobias Vervliet, 2019. "Treatment responses of mental health care providers after a demand shock," CPB Discussion Paper 404.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.