IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v20y2024i6p54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ostensible Refusals in Mandarin Chinese

Author

Listed:
  • Fenghua Zhang

Abstract

This study investigates ostensible refusals in response to four types of stimulus speech acts (request, suggestion, invitation and offer). Based on the collected data, the study aims to make an overall analysis of ostensible refusal speech acts in Chinese language and explores the basic guiding principle that underlies the interactional process of ostensible refusing. Consequently, it briefly revisits the ostensible refusals in Chinese context. The results show that ostensible refusals can exist in all four types of initiating speech acts, among which the ostensible refusals to request and suggestion are rarely investigated. Overall, ostensible refusals rely on both linguistic and non-linguistic (prosodic and paralinguistic features) devices. In terms of manner and pragmatic efforts of ostensible refusing, they vary slightly from type to type. Underlying the ostensible refusal-negotiation is the dynamic balance principle which guides interactants to employ different pragmatic strategies in ostensible refusing.

Suggested Citation

  • Fenghua Zhang, 2024. "Ostensible Refusals in Mandarin Chinese," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 20(6), pages 1-54, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:20:y:2024:i:6:p:54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/0/0/50955/55236
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/0/50955
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:20:y:2024:i:6:p:54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.