IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v20y2024i6p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Silk and Silkworm: (Re)discussion on the Origin and Early History of Using Silk Fibres

Author

Listed:
  • Xiyao Zhang
  • Xiaoming Yang

Abstract

Discussions on the origin of silk utilisation usually focus on the origin of discovering filaments, ignoring the existence and availability of short fibres. Among these studies, some arguments with evidence of silkworms have inserted a preconception that silkworm rearing is certainly related to silk utilisation, ignoring the possibility that human ancestors might have reared silkworms for other reasons before they knew how to use silk fibres. Considering the difficulties in obtaining raw materials, the complexity of the production processes, and archaeological evidence for the early use of silk, it seems probable that silk was utilised first in the form of short fibres and these fibres were processed with the spinning technique. By analysing the relationship between silk reeling and weaving, silk reeling was invented to answer the growing demands of the weaving industry. By analysing the relationship between silk utilisation and silkworm rearing, silkworm domestication was motivated and prompted by the growing demand from silk reeling workshops. Silk reeling appeared after the birth of weaving and before the activity of rearing silkworms. Combined with the scientific study results of the silkworm taming and domestication time, silk fibres were discovered and used before 7000 BP.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiyao Zhang & Xiaoming Yang, 2024. "Silk and Silkworm: (Re)discussion on the Origin and Early History of Using Silk Fibres," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 20(6), pages 1-1, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:20:y:2024:i:6:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/0/0/50947/55228
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/0/50947
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:20:y:2024:i:6:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.