IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v16y2020i5p106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differing Quality of Life by Understanding Alternative Personal Profiles of People in Community-Based Tourism, Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Akkhaporn Kokkhangplu
  • Kanokkarn Kaewnuch

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate the differences between individual factors affecting quality of life (QOL) for people conducting community-based tourism (CBT). A sample size of 200 comprised people in CBT, Thailand. The data were collected to achieve the research objective by studying the personal profiles of people in CBT including sex, age, education, occupation and income affecting quality of life. Other factors included physical conditions of individuals, psychological state, perception of the relationship between individuals and others and environment. The research employed descriptive and inferential statistics, the F test (one-way ANOVA), to evaluate the data. The results revealed that only education factor significantly differed at level 0.05. Conversely, the factors sex, age, occupation and income showed no significant differences at level 0.05. The result of a study indicates educational level was essential for QOL. Therefore, education, as the most significant factor, should be set as a priority to lead the planning process in various aspects of QOL. Even the community and society need to focus on educational factors leading to a higher QOL. The contribution of this research was to enhance education in society, particularly in CBT to all individuals in the community to obtain greater opportunity to equally access education.

Suggested Citation

  • Akkhaporn Kokkhangplu & Kanokkarn Kaewnuch, 2020. "Differing Quality of Life by Understanding Alternative Personal Profiles of People in Community-Based Tourism, Thailand," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(5), pages 106-106, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:16:y:2020:i:5:p:106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/0/0/42657/44550
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/0/42657
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chi, Christina Geng-qing & Cai, Ruiying & Li, Yongfen, 2017. "Factors influencing residents’ subjective well-being at World Heritage Sites," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 209-222.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinghua Han & Keji Huang & Shiwei Shen, 2022. "Are Tourism Practitioners Happy? The Role of Explanatory Style Played on Tourism Practitioners’ Psychological Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Çalişkan, Uğur & Gursoy, Dogan & Özer, Özgür & Chi, Oscar Hengxuan, 2022. "Effects of Tourism on Local Residents’ Quality of Life, Happiness and Life Satisfaction: Moderating Role of the COVID-19 Risk Perceptions," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 10(4), pages 274-291.
    3. María Ángeles Plaza-Mejía & Nuria Porras-Bueno & David Flores-Ruiz, 2020. "The Jungle of Support: What Do We Really Mean When We Say “Residents’ Support”?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    4. Hayrol Azril Mohamed Shaffril & Asnarulkhadi Abu Samah & Samsul Farid Samsuddin, 2022. "The Impacts of Fishermen’s Resilience towards Climate Change on Their Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Di Wu & Caiyun Shen & Enxu Wang & Yaoyao Hou & Jun Yang, 2019. "Impact of the Perceived Authenticity of Heritage Sites on Subjective Well-Being: A Study of the Mediating Role of Place Attachment and Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Chang-Lan Xia & Tung-Ju Wu & An-Pin Wei & Pei-Guan Wu, 2020. "Are Chinese Entrepreneurs Happier than Employees? Evidence Based on a National Workforce Survey in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Shanshan Dai & Honggang Xu & Fangfang Chen, 2019. "A Hierarchical Measurement Model of Perceived Resilience of Urban Tourism Destination," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 777-804, September.
    8. María J. Moreno & F. Javier Otamendi, 2017. "Fostering Nautical Tourism in the Balearic Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Weiwei Wang & Guojing Yang & Yan Sun & Yong Chen & Lihua Zhou, 2019. "Linking Prohibited Grazing Policy to Farmers’ Subjective Well-Being: A Case Study in Yanchi County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Hawar Himdad J. Sektani & Mahmood Khayat & Masi Mohammadi & Ana Pereira Roders, 2021. "Erbil City Built Heritage and Wellbeing: An Assessment of Local Perceptions Using the Semantic Differential Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Parga Dans, Eva & Alonso González, Pablo, 2019. "Sustainable tourism and social value at World Heritage Sites: Towards a conservation plan for Altamira, Spain," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 68-80.
    12. Qingliu Ren & Baoshi He & Xiaodong Chen & Jiali Han & Fang Han, 2021. "The Mechanism and Mediating Effect of the “Perception–Emotion–Behaviour” Chain of Tourists at World Natural Heritage Sites—A Case Study from Bayanbulak, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Peiying Dang & Linjing Ren & Jie Li, 2024. "Does rural tourism reduce relative poverty? Evidence from household surveys in western China," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(2), pages 498-521, March.
    14. Hanbyeol Jang & Jeremy Mennis, 2021. "The Role of Local Communities and Well-Being in UNESCO World Heritage Site Conservation: An Analysis of the Operational Guidelines, 1994–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Hui Zhang & Wenhui Li, 2022. "Where You Live Does Matter: Impact of Residents’ Place Image on Their Subjective Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Rong Li & Li Peng & Wei Deng, 2019. "Resident Perceptions toward Tourism Development at a Large Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-12, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:16:y:2020:i:5:p:106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.