IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/ijmmre/v1y2008i1p111-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Training, Reasoning Skills, and Philosophical Orientation: Correlates of Ethical Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Angelina S. MacKewn
  • K.W. VanVuren

Abstract

In today’s business world it is essential that managers/employees engage in ethical thinking and behavior in making the decisions that are part-and-parcel of operating a successful business. Therefore, it would benefit businesses to understand, as much as possible, the various characteristics, influences, or factors which induce or predict ethical decision-making. This paper describes a study in which students at a mid-south USA university were used as proxies for business-trained persons versus non-business trained persons, to explore the issue of whether a business background, i.e., training, makes a difference in the ethical decision-making of persons engaged in business situations. The major finding of the study is that yes, in some instances, business-trained versus non-business trained persons do render statistically significant different decisions in business-oriented scenario. Reasoning skills and philosophical orientation were also examined as co-variates. Although the statistical evidence was not as strong, results indicated that reasoning skills and philosophical orientation also explain some of the variation observed in ethical decisions/judgments in business-oriented scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelina S. MacKewn & K.W. VanVuren, 2008. "Business Training, Reasoning Skills, and Philosophical Orientation: Correlates of Ethical Decision-Making," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 1(1), pages 111-127.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibf:ijmmre:v:1:y:2008:i:1:p:111-127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/ijmmre/ijmmr-v1n1-2008/IJMMR-V1N1-2008-7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:ijmmre:v:1:y:2008:i:1:p:111-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.