IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/beaccr/v14y2022i1p33-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining If Grading Bias Exists In A Professor Of Business Courses: An Individual Study

Author

Listed:
  • Gary F. Keller

Abstract

This research paper investigated if grading bias based on gender, course modality (face-to-face and online) and grade level (undergraduate vs. graduate) existed in classes the researcher taught over a three-year period. During the course of the literature review for this investigation, a meta-analysis suggested that more research was needed on a micro level regarding bias rather than reliance on results from metanalysis reports. A second goal was the extension of two studies conducted by the researcher that examined if relationships existed between the amount of time students spent on course assignments and final grades and if the quantity of time a faculty member spent grading student assignments affected final grades given. In this study grades assigned during the academic years 2018 – 2020 derived from the University’s Canvas Learning Management System were analyzed. The population studied consisted of 912 students enrolled in undergraduate and graduate courses taught at a public university located in the Pacific Northwest. The main results from this examination showed statistically significant differences were found in aggregate totals between the grades of males and females and the grades of females enrolled in online and face to face courses in two of the three years of the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary F. Keller, 2022. "Examining If Grading Bias Exists In A Professor Of Business Courses: An Individual Study," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 14(1), pages 33-42.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibf:beaccr:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:33-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/beaccr/bea-v14n1-2022/BEA-V14N1-2022-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Discrimination; Gender Stereotypes; Natural Experiment; Biased Grading;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:beaccr:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:33-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.