IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/acttax/v8y2016i1p49-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Substantial Authority Update: Tax Penalty Avoidance By Good Faith Reference To Judicial, Administrative And Legislative Authorities

Author

Listed:
  • Albert D. Spalding
  • Nancy W. Spalding

Abstract

Internal Revenue Code (IRC) 6662(b) authorizes the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to impose a penalty if an underpayment of income tax by a taxpayer exceeds a computational threshold called a substantial understatement. An understatement is reduced, however, by the portion attributable to an item for which the taxpayer had substantial authority. Substantial authority is defined in Treasury Regulation §1,66624(d)(2), but taxpayers are required to recognize and take into account the relative weight of various authorities such as regulations, revenue rulings, legislative histories, court cases and IRS pronouncements. Alternatively, taxpayers may make a reasonable cause argument for the waiver of underpayment penalties, claiming that they made a good faith effort to comply with the IRC requirements. We examine the manner and extent to which courts have been willing to waive penalties based on substantial authority cited by taxpayers. We also analyze cases in which taxpayers have claimed reasonable cause. We draw conclusions about judicial responses to these two penalty avoidance arguments

Suggested Citation

  • Albert D. Spalding & Nancy W. Spalding, 2016. "Substantial Authority Update: Tax Penalty Avoidance By Good Faith Reference To Judicial, Administrative And Legislative Authorities," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 8(1), pages 49-58.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibf:acttax:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:49-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/acttax/at-v8n1-2016/AT-V8N1-2016-4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Preparer Penalties; Substantial Authority; Taxation; Tax Penalties; Accuracy-Related Penalty;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • K34 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Tax Law
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:acttax:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:49-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.