IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2024i4p69-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Materiality Level in the Audit of Financial Statements and Its Impact on the Auditor's Professional Judgment

Author

Listed:
  • Yuliia Ostapenko

    (Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

When developing a general audit strategy, the auditor determines the materiality of the financial statements as a whole. In addition, the auditor must determine the materiality of the results of the activity to assess the risks of material misstatement and determine the nature, timing and scope of further audit procedures. The article aims to summarize the basic principles of establishing the materiality level in the audit of financial statements and determine its impact on the auditor's professional judgment application. The use of the concept of materiality is an integral part of the general methodology that determines the procedure for conducting an audit of financial statements. The article reveals approaches to assessing the materiality level in an audit based on an analysis of the provisions of international auditing standards. It was revealed that the complexity of determining materiality lies in that each user has their own interests, which determine what material is to them in the financial information received. The article presents an algorithm for determining materiality in an audit based on applying the auditor's professional judgment. Considerable attention in the study was paid to the features of the regulatory regulation of the mechanism for calculating materiality at the level of financial reporting as a whole and for performing audit procedures. At the same time, there are no unified rules and methods for determining the materiality level today. Instead, in audit practice, the working materiality level is set as a percentage of materiality for financial reporting as a whole according to the auditor's professional judgment, depending on the assessment of the risks of material misstatement: low - 75-80%; medium - 60-70%; high - 40-65%. The article presents typical financial reporting misstatements and the reasons for their occurrence. The study's results will allow auditors to better understand the impact of material errors on the reliability of financial reporting and audit results, as well as the relationship between audit risk and the materiality indicator for performing audit procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuliia Ostapenko, 2024. "Materiality Level in the Audit of Financial Statements and Its Impact on the Auditor's Professional Judgment," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 4, pages 69-75, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2024:i:4:p:69-75
    DOI: 10.33146/2307-9878-2024-4(106)-69-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/1106-vstanovlennya-rivnya-suttevosti-pri-perevirci-finansovoi-zvitnosti-ta-yogo-vpliv-na-profesiyne-sudzhennya-auditora.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/1106/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33146/2307-9878-2024-4(106)-69-75?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    financial reporting; audit; materiality level; auditor's professional judgment; distorted information; reliable information;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2024:i:4:p:69-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhiy Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.