IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2024i3p132-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical Conduct and Independence in Audit and Control of Public Institutions in Romania: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Lucia-Maria Udrescu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mihai Ciobotea

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Internal audits play a key role in ensuring the efficiency of public institutions in Romania. However, the effectiveness of internal auditing is often compromised by challenges to the integrity and independence of the auditor. Independence in the activities of civil servants, particularly internal auditors, is crucial for unbiased assessments, free from undue influence by other parties. This article examines the ethics and independence of internal audit and control in public institutions in Romania. The purpose of the study is to assess compliance with ethical principles and independence by internal auditors in public institutions in Romania and to identify obstacles affecting the integrity of audit and control functions. The research methodology includes the distribution of questionnaires to public officials working in public institutions in Romania, complemented by an analysis of the ethical frameworks guiding these professionals. This approach aims to identify both the current state of ethical practice and the barriers to maintaining independence in audit processes. Despite significant progress achieved through the EU directive and concerted efforts to increase transparency and objectivity, challenges remain, threatening the integrity of auditing. The main findings of the investigation indicate that the main obstacles are political influence, resistance to change and insufficient resources to uphold the standards of ethics and independence of internal audit. Ethical leadership and supporting organizational culture are critical to promoting transparency, accountability and ethical behaviour in public institutions. In addition, it was found that the internal audit function is prone to modernization in the conditions of the intellectual economy. Therefore, part of it is likely to be performed by programs based on artificial intelligence. Based on the obtained results, the article provides recommendations for ensuring the ethical behaviour and independence of internal auditors in public institutions in Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucia-Maria Udrescu & Mihai Ciobotea, 2024. "Ethical Conduct and Independence in Audit and Control of Public Institutions in Romania: A Case Study," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 132-141, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2024:i:3:p:132-141
    DOI: 10.33146/2307-9878-2024-3(105)-132-141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/1094-etichna-povedinka-ta-nezalezhnist-pid-chas-auditu-ta-kontrolyu-derzhavnih-ustanov-u-rumunii-praktichne-doslidzhennya.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/1094/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33146/2307-9878-2024-3(105)-132-141?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    internal audit ethics; public internal audit; internal control; independence;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2024:i:3:p:132-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhiy Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.