Author
Abstract
This paper reports the findings of a study that has attempted to find out the perceptions and classroom teaching practices of Science teacher educator about environmental education (EE) infusion. The study also looked at the process of environmental infusion in Science and associated challenges emerging from it.The research was designed in a qualitative paradigm, within this paradigm, action research model proposed by Retallick (2003) was used. The purposive sampling strategy was used to select research participant. The research participant of this study was a Science teacher educator. Semi-structured interviews, classroom observation were major data collection tools. Thematic approach was used to analyze the data. The findings of the study have been based on pre-intervention, intervention and post-intervention stage. The major findings revealed that at pre-intervention stage, Science teacher educator’s understanding about environmental education was limited. This takes into account only knowledge dimension of environmental issues. Other aspects for discussing environmental issues such as skill development, attitude formation and taking informed action for the solution of environmental problems were missing from his teaching. The research study enabled research participant to develop his capacity in delivering EE concepts confidently. However, environmental infusion was challenging for Science teacher educator because of the nature and complexity of environmental issues. For discussing environmental issues, sound knowledge base is very essential. In the light of the findings, some recommendations for Science teacher educators, curriculum developers and textbook writers have been made.
Suggested Citation
Shahid Hussain Mughal, 2015.
"An Action Research to Facilitate Science Teacher Educator in Infusing Environment Education Themes,"
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 1-9, August.
Handle:
RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:5:y:2015:i:8:p:1-9
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:5:y:2015:i:8:p:1-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hassan Danial Aslam (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.