IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hur/ijarbs/v5y2015i5p115-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of the Fuzzy Logic in Explanation of Effective Factors on Commercialization of Products (Empirical Evidence: Knowledge-Based Business of Incubators Centers of Iran North Region)

Author

Listed:
  • Zahra Sorori Eshliki
  • Mojtaba Fallahnejad
  • Mehrdad Zolfi
  • Saber Khalili Esbouei

Abstract

In today’s globalized economy, companies are facing ever increasing competitive pressures. A commonly adopted strategy for remaining competitive is to commercialize Products. Commercialization activities play an important role in bringing to market new t Products is the knowledge based companies. The goal of the current Research is the show Effective factors on Commercialization of Products in Knowledge-Based Business. The sample of this study is all managers of knowledge based companies in development centers which established in the northern regions of Iran. The data are collected by questionnaire with the reliability coefficient 86% of the sample. Data analyzed by using fuzzy hypothesis testing approach. The results of this work provide useful insights for improving the commercialization decisions of product for managers of knowledge based companies in competitive markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Zahra Sorori Eshliki & Mojtaba Fallahnejad & Mehrdad Zolfi & Saber Khalili Esbouei, 2015. "Application of the Fuzzy Logic in Explanation of Effective Factors on Commercialization of Products (Empirical Evidence: Knowledge-Based Business of Incubators Centers of Iran North Region)," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(5), pages 115-126, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:5:y:2015:i:5:p:115-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Application_of_the_Fuzzy_Logic_in_Explanation_of_Effective_Factors.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Application_of_the_Fuzzy_Logic_in_Explanation_of_Effective_Factors.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc H. Meyer & Edward B. Roberts, 1986. "New Product Strategy in Small Technology-Based Firms: A Pilot Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(7), pages 806-821, July.
    2. Chih-Jou Chen & Chia-Chin Chang & Shiu-Wan Hung, 2011. "Influences of Technological Attributes and Environmental Factors on Technology Commercialization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(4), pages 525-535, December.
    3. Kimura, Osamu, 2010. "Public R&D and commercialization of energy-efficient technology: A case study of Japanese projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 7358-7369, November.
    4. Gary Gorman & Sean McCarthy, 2006. "Business Development Support and Knowledge-Based Businesses," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 131-143, January.
    5. Bollinger, Lynn & Hope, Katherine & Utterback, James M., 1983. "A review of literature and hypotheses on new technology-based firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mijung Jung & Yi-beck Lee & Heesang Lee, 2015. "Classifying and prioritizing the success and failure factors of technology commercialization of public R&D in South Korea: using classification tree analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 40(5), pages 877-898, October.
    2. Dina Cunha & Sandra T. Silva & Aurora A.C. Teixeira, 2013. "Are Academic Spin-Offs necessarily New Technology-Based firms?," FEP Working Papers 482, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    3. Hasan Boudlaie, 2020. "Studying the content characteristics of New Technology-Based Firms," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 3(1), pages 94-111, February.
    4. E J Malecki & P Nijkamp, 1988. "Technology and Regional Development: Some Thoughts on Policy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 6(4), pages 383-399, December.
    5. Gambardella, Alfonso & Giuri, Paola & Luzzi, Alessandra, 2007. "The market for patents in Europe," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 1163-1183, October.
    6. Barry L. Bayus & Rajshree Agarwal, 2007. "The Role of Pre-Entry Experience, Entry Timing, and Product Technology Strategies in Explaining Firm Survival," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(12), pages 1887-1902, December.
    7. Soltanzadeh, Javad & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Khosroshahi, Elnaz Mesma & Bouguerra, Abderaouf, 2024. "Commercializing Covid-19 diagnostic technologies: A review of challenges, success factors, and insights from the profiting from innovation framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    8. Hauschildt, Jürgen, 1990. "Zur Messung des Innovationserfolgs: Revidierte Fassung eines Vortrags der 2nd TIM Conference of Technology Management, Hamburg, 10./11. Mai 1990," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 253, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    9. Dahlstrand, Asa Lindholm, 1997. "Growth and inventiveness in technology-based spin-off firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 331-344, October.
    10. Xue Wang, 2018. "The Effect Of Inbound Open Innovation On Firm Performance In Japanese Manufacturing Firms: Comparative Study Between Research Centre And Business Unit," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-35, October.
    11. Brockhoff, Klaus K. & Rao, Vithala R., 1991. "Issues in predicting the demand for a new technological product," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 270, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    12. Kamann, D.J. & Nijkamp, P., 1988. "Technogenesis : incubation and diffusion," Serie Research Memoranda 0024, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    13. Roberts, Edward Baer., 1989. "Strategic transformation and the success of high technology companies," Working papers 3066-89., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    14. Debackere, Koenraad & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2005. "The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 321-342, April.
    15. Linda F. Tegarden & Ann E. Echols & Donald E. Hatfield, 2000. "The Value of Patience and Start-up Firms: A Re-Examination of Entry Timing for Emerging Markets," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 24(4), pages 41-58, July.
    16. Perkmann, Markus & Walsh, Kathryn, 2008. "Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1884-1891, December.
    17. Wang, Chi-Feng & Chen, Li-Yu & Chang, Shao-Chi, 2011. "International diversification and the market value of new product introduction," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 333-347.
    18. Hanna Rydehell & Anders Isaksson & Hans Löfsten, 2019. "Effects Of Internal And External Resource Dimensions On The Business Performance Of New Technology-Based Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(01), pages 1-29, January.
    19. Annamaria Fiore & Maria Jennifer Grisorio & Francesco Prota, 2009. "Do we really need regional innovation agencies? Some insights from the experience of an Italian region," SERIES 0025, Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza - Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro", revised Nov 2009.
    20. Stephan Hess & Simon Suhrbeer & Roland Y. Siegwart, 2013. "The Impact of Collaborative Innovation between Established Industry and Academic Technology Spin-offs," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(3), pages 1-15, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:5:y:2015:i:5:p:115-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hassan Danial Aslam (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.