Author
Abstract
The decision to accept the division of teaching other subjects are not based on a sense of moral responsibility as a professional teacher. In order to improve the quality of Education if there is a teacher who teach various subjects. When teachers teach the subject matter is not the subject they teach the learning process that takes place may be bad, because the teacher is no longer the focus on the subject matter into the field. The focus of the problem in this research is to be answered in this study, the subsequent formulation of the problem or research question is the following is the extent to which the amount of the workload of teachers make a positive contribution in the development of education. By using qualitative research methodology is because the data collected and the analysis is qualitative. Qualitative research requires information into to the level of significance. Qualitative studies further emphasize the significance of the generalization. Source of data in this research is the source of the data is a source of primary data that has not been certified teachers, and who have been certified either already getting benefits or not professional educators, and principals in Junior High School in the District Pamatang Sidamanik. It is still to be between 24-40 hours per week. So it can be explained that all teachers, amounting to 9 people in the Junior High School 2 Pamatang Sidamanik workload gets a minimum of 24 hours of face to face, the ideal study group is 4 and the structure of the curriculum already plus a maximum of 4 les, where one person as the head of the school, which calculated with a load equivalent to 18 hours of work face to face, and 4 among the received additional duties as Assistant principals with the workload of each equivalent to 12 hours of face to face and one of them as head of the library with the workload equivalent to 12 hours of face to face. This calculation is correct when allowed teachers to teach not only the subject areas taught.
Suggested Citation
Corry, 2015.
"Workload Analysis Teachers in Development Education (Case Studies Teachers in Junior High School District of Pamatang Sidamanik),"
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(1), pages 399-411, January.
Handle:
RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:5:y:2015:i:1:p:399-411
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:5:y:2015:i:1:p:399-411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hassan Danial Aslam (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.