IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hur/ijarbs/v4y2014i6p303-314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing Implementation Of Just In Time Procurement in Public Institutions: A Case of Office of the Attorney General and Department Of Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Adagala Dickson Voleza

Abstract

Procurement is an important aspect of all public institutions within government. This explains why over 60% of exchequers budget is appropriated through procurement in Kenya. There is however a continued concern over the implementation of Just in Time procurement in government institutions in Kenya. This study therefore was set out to establish the factors that influence the implementation of Just in Time procurement in public institutions. The study also sought to examine recommendations on ways to enhance Just in Time procurement in these institutions. From the literature review a number of studies revealed that the factors influencing the implementation of JIT vary from one institution to another. The factors considered in this study were: lead time, procurement processes, professionalism and top management support. The objectives were to determine the factors that influence the implementation of Just in Time procurement in the Office of Attorney General and Department of Justice which include lead time, procurement processes, procurement professionalism and top management support. The target population was the staff, the suppliers and the senior procurement officers. Both staff’ and suppliers were randomly selected based on their gender, user Departments and on the number of items they deal in respectively. Questionnaires and interviews were used to collect data. The data collected was for the interviews and analyzed qualitatively for the interviews and quantitatively for the questionnaires using SPSS. The study revealed that long lead times, rigid procurement procedures, unprofessionalism and top management ambivalence are the major causes of slow implementation of Just in Time procurement in the public institutions, hence need to be addressed. This could be done by reducing the turnaround period, improve communication with all the stakeholders, employ professional qualified procurement staff and change inventory methods. Based on the findings the following recommendations were made: that long lead times can be reduced through automation, harmonize the Public Procurement and Disposal Act to serve local needs, train user Departments on pre-requisites of requisitioning and documentation in order to minimize rejections. Procurement plans must be harmonized based on their cost-benefit analysis so as to achieve value for money; The choice of procurement method, sourcing for bidders; evaluation processes and appraisal of suppliers to be expedited diligently to avoid return of funds to the treasury; Top management must embrace and appreciate implementation JIT because it reduces the cost of doing business, adds value for money while enabling them achieve their mission and vision in their strategic plans. Public institutions ought to increase employee’s involvement for purposes of service delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • Adagala Dickson Voleza, 2014. "Factors Influencing Implementation Of Just In Time Procurement in Public Institutions: A Case of Office of the Attorney General and Department Of Justice," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(6), pages 303-314, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:4:y:2014:i:6:p:303-314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Factors_Influencing_Implementation_Of_Just_In_Time_Procurement_in_Public_Institutions_A_Case_of_Office_of_the_Attorney_General_and_Department_Of_Justice.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Factors_Influencing_Implementation_Of_Just_In_Time_Procurement_in_Public_Institutions_A_Case_of_Office_of_the_Attorney_General_and_Department_Of_Justice.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neumann, W.P. & Dul, J., 2010. "Human Factors: Spanning the Gap between OM & HRM," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2010-020-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoshihiko Kadoya & Mostafa Saidur Rahim Khan & Somtip Watanapongvanich & Punjapol Binnagan, 2020. "Emotional Status and Productivity: Evidence from the Special Economic Zone in Laos," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Timothy Gubler & Ian Larkin & Lamar Pierce, 2018. "Doing Well by Making Well: The Impact of Corporate Wellness Programs on Employee Productivity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 4967-4987, November.
    3. Huiyue Diao & Majid Ghorbani, 2018. "Production risk caused by human factors: a multiple case study of thermal power plants," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Aurelia Rybak & Aleksandra Rybak, 2020. "Analysis of the Main Coal Mining Restructuring Policy Objectives in the Light of Polish Mining Companies’ Ability to Change," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Vasiliki Kapou & Stavros T. Ponis & George Plakas & Eleni Aretoulaki, 2022. "An Innovative Layout Design and Storage Assignment Method for Manual Order Picking with Respect to Ergonomic Criteria," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Sobhani, A. & Wahab, M.I.M. & Jaber, M.Y., 2019. "The effect of working environment aspects on a vendor–buyer inventory model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 171-183.
    7. Ozdemir, Rifat & Sarigol, Ilkan & AlMutairi, Sarah & AlMeea, Sarah & Murad, Abrar & Naqi, Aseel & AlNasser, Noor, 2021. "Fuzzy multi-objective model for assembly line balancing with ergonomic risks consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    8. Valentina De Simone & Valentina Di Pasquale & Maria Elena Nenni & Salvatore Miranda, 2023. "Sustainable Production Planning and Control in Manufacturing Contexts: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Sobhani, A. & Wahab, M.I.M. & Neumann, W.P., 2017. "Incorporating human factors-related performance variation in optimizing a serial system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 69-83.
    10. Mahroof, Kamran, 2019. "A human-centric perspective exploring the readiness towards smart warehousing: The case of a large retail distribution warehouse," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 176-190.
    11. Sobhani, A. & Wahab, M.I.M. & Neumann, W.P., 2015. "Investigating work-related ill health effects in optimizing the performance of manufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(3), pages 708-718.
    12. Nima Kazemi & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid & Ehsan Shekarian & Eleonora Bottani & Roberto Montanari, 2016. "A fuzzy lot-sizing problem with two-stage composite human learning," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(16), pages 5010-5025, August.
    13. Dominic Loske & Matthias Klumpp & Maria Keil & Thomas Neukirchen, 2021. "Logistics Work, Ergonomics and Social Sustainability: Empirical Musculoskeletal System Strain Assessment in Retail Intralogistics," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-25, December.
    14. Kenneth Lawani & Chioma Okoro & Michael Tong & Billy Hare, 2020. "Maximizing Construction of Timber Kit Homes Using Telescopic Crane to Improve Efficiency and Safety: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Rodriguez Luna, Raúl Enrique & Rosenstiehl Martinez, José Luis, 2018. "Gestión de operaciones y talento humano: un modelo de elección discreta," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 19(2), pages 92-112, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:4:y:2014:i:6:p:303-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hassan Danial Aslam (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.