IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hur/ijaraf/v2y2012i3p17-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditors’ Perceptions of Reasonable Assurance the Effectiveness of the Audit Risk Model. Case from Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Hashem Valipour

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Javad Moradi

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Hajar Moazaminezhad

    (Islamic Azad University)

Abstract

Despite the definition of the concept of logical confidence in auditing standards, the results from some studies conducted indicate a meaningful difference between perceptions this basic concept, by different auditors (Law, 2008, 180). The results from some researches also indicate that auditors’ perceptions about the effectiveness of the audit risk model vary (which is based on auditing general principles on the basis of risk) (Arense, 2006, 148). In so doing, aiming at studying the proof for the above, mentioned hypotheses Iran’s auditing setting; in this article we will study Iranian auditors’ perceptions of reasonable assurance in auditing work and the effectiveness of the audit risk model and the impact of gender, education, official auditor certificate and job rank on this perceptions. The research methodology applied is descriptive - survey and statistical population includes independent auditors working in Iranian private auditing institutes in two ranks of partner and administrators where 269 people were chosen as samples applying accidental sampling (including 150 administrators and 119 institute partners). The required data has been collected through questionnaires and in order to analyze the collected data, inferring and descriptive statistical methods have been applied. The results indicate significant differences between the auditors’ perceptions with different job rank, gender and qualified for official auditor certificate touching reasonable assurance in auditing work the effectiveness of the audit risk model.

Suggested Citation

  • Hashem Valipour & Javad Moradi & Hajar Moazaminezhad, 2012. "Auditors’ Perceptions of Reasonable Assurance the Effectiveness of the Audit Risk Model. Case from Iran," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 2(3), pages 17-34, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:hur:ijaraf:v:2:y:2012:i:3:p:17-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hrmars.com/admin/pics/914.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.hrmars.com/admin/pics/914.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Schelluch & Grant Gay, 2006. "Assurance provided by auditors’ reports on prospective financial information: implications for the expectation gap," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(4), pages 653-676, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Carassus & Khaled Albouaini & Marie Caussimont, 2013. "Une analyse de l'Audit Expectation Gap dans le contexte français," Post-Print hal-02432110, HAL.
    2. Masoud, Najeb, 2017. "An empirical study of audit expectation-performance gap: The case of Libya," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Pranil Prasad & Parmod Chand, 2017. "The Changing Face of the Auditor's Report: Implications for Suppliers and Users of Financial Statements," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(4), pages 348-367, December.
    4. Xin Chang & André F. Gygax & Elaine Oon & Hong Feng Zhang, 2008. "Audit quality, auditor compensation and initial public offering underpricing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(3), pages 391-416, September.
    5. Quick, Reiner & Gauch, Kevin, 2021. "Is assurance on risk management systems relevant for bankers’ decisions?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    6. Klaus Ruhnke & Catharina Schmiele & Jochen Schwind, 2010. "Die Erwartungslücke als permanentes Phänomen der Abschlussprüfung — Definitionsansatz, empirische Untersuchung und Schlussfolgerungen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 394-421, June.
    7. Taslima Akther & Fengju Xu, 2020. "Existence of the Audit Expectation Gap and Its Impact on Stakeholders’ Confidence: The Moderating Role of the Financial Reporting Council," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, January.
    8. Heliodoro, Paula Alexandra & Carreira, Francisco Alegria & Lopes, Manuel Mouta, 2016. "The change of auditor: The Portuguese case," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 181-186.
    9. Taslima Akther & Xu Fengju & Md Ziaul Haque, 2019. "An Investigation ofAudit Expectation Gap in Bangladesh," Journal of Business, LAR Center Press, vol. 4(2), pages 1-11, February.
    10. Tomasz Iwanowicz & Bartłomiej Iwanowicz, 2019. "ISA 701 and Materiality Disclosure as Methods to Minimize the Audit Expectation Gap," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Archel, Pablo & Carrasco, Francisco & García-Benau, María Antonia & Larrinaga, Carlos, 2022. "Intellectual engagements of accounting academics: The ‘forecasted losses' intervention," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    12. Cuadrado-Ballesteros, Beatriz & Martínez-Ferrero, Jennifer & García-Sánchez, Isabel María, 2017. "Mitigating information asymmetry through sustainability assurance: The role of accountants and levels of assurance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 1141-1156.
    13. Andrea Caputo & Alberto Tron, 2016. "The attestation of corporate turnaround plans in Italy: operating problems and possible solutions," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 30-44.
    14. Kristy Hodge & Nava Subramaniam & Jenny Stewart, 2009. "Assurance of Sustainability Reports: Impact on Report Users' Confidence and Perceptions of Information Credibility," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 19(3), pages 178-194, September.
    15. Li Chen & David Hay & Jingyuan Zhuang, 2020. "Initial public offering prospectus forecast errors and mandatory explanations: evidence from New Zealand," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2167-2202, September.
    16. Fengju Xu & Taslima Akther, 2019. "A Partial Least-Squares Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Investigate the Audit Expectation Gap and Its Impact on Investor Confidence: Perspectives from a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Josh Wei-Jun Hsueh, 2018. "Governance Structure and the Credibility Gap: Experimental Evidence on Family Businesses’ Sustainability Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(2), pages 547-568, December.
    18. David Hay & Noel Harding & Pallab Biswas & Chris Gan & Irene Qingling Ge & Linh Ho & Dinithi Ranasinghe & Harj Singh & Nigar Sultana & Shan Zhou, 2024. "Comments on Exposure Draft for Proposed ISSA 5000, sustainability assurance engagements by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Committee of AFAANZ," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(1), pages 1221-1239, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Reasonable assurance; audit risk model; institute partners; auditing administrators; official auditor certificate; gender; and job rank;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hur:ijaraf:v:2:y:2012:i:3:p:17-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hassan Danial Aslam (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/Accounting-Finance-Journal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.