IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hrs/journl/vviiiy2016i3p89-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A HYBRID MODEL PROPOSAL BASED ON SCM AND RCM ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN MODELS (A.B.Ms)

Author

Listed:
  • Nikos ALABANOS

    (Department of Maritime Studies, University of Piraeus)

  • Sotiris THODOROPOULOS

    (Department of Maritime Studies, University of Piraeus)

Abstract

The existent administrative burden models’ (ABM’s) perform certain weaknesses mainly on: a) Regulatory cost measurement expansion, b) Integration & standardization of data and sampling measurement methods, c) Integration & Standardization of time and resources d) Evaluation of the weaknesses of Public Administration and e) lack of standardized international comparison benchmark. Based on these main deficiencies the address of certain amendments that will meet contemporary challenges such as: i) the standardization of data collection methodology, ii) a more solid substantive cost measurement methodology, iii) an extended AB measurement capabilities module and finally iv) the feature of international comparison, is a significant amelioration.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikos ALABANOS & Sotiris THODOROPOULOS, 2016. "A HYBRID MODEL PROPOSAL BASED ON SCM AND RCM ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN MODELS (A.B.Ms)," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(3), pages 89-97, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:hrs:journl:v:viii:y:2016:i:3:p:89-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rsijournal.eu/ARTICLES/December_2016/8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank A.G. den Butter & Marc de Graaf & André Nijsen, 2009. "The Transaction Costs Perspective on Costs And Benefits of Government Regulation," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 09-013/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    2. International Finance Corporation & World Bank, 2010. "Here Is Your Money," World Bank Publications - Reports 27829, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikos Alabanos & Sotiris Theodoropoulos, 2016. "A key-point comparison & the new challenges for the existent Administrative Burden Models (A.B.M’s)," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 66(1-2), pages 32-45, January-J.
    2. Nikos ALABANOS & Sotiris THODOROPOULOS, 2016. "A HYBRID MODEL PROPOSAL BASED ON SCM AND RCM ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN MODELS (A.B.Ms)," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(3), pages 89-97, December.
    3. S. Vishnuhadevi, 2021. "Administrative and Compliance Costs of Value Added Tax (VAT): A Review," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 26(2), pages 179-206, December.
    4. M. Maegli & C. Jaag & M. Finger, 2010. "Regulatory Governance Costs in Network Industries: Observations in Postal Regulation," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 11(2), pages 207-238, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Administrative burden; Administrative Burden Model (A.B.M.); administrative costs; substantive costs; international comparison; Standard Cost Model (S.C.M.); Regulatory Cost Measurement Model (R.C.M.).;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hrs:journl:v:viii:y:2016:i:3:p:89-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrios K. Kouzas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.