IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hom/homoec/v20y2004p361-390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factionalsim, Violence and Bargaining in Civil Wars

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon H. McCormick

    (Department of Defense Analysis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, USA)

  • Guillermo Owen

    (Department of Mathematics, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, USA)

Abstract

We consider the problem of conflict resolution between a state and a sub-state challenger in a civil war. Until now, the literature on civil war bargaining has largely assumed that each side in the conflict negotiates as a unitary actor. The present paper extends our understanding of this problem by making the more realistic assumption that one or both sides enters the bargaining process as a heterogeneous actor, subject to competing internal perspectives on the value of negotiations. We find that the prospects for a settlement and the stability of any settlement that might be achieved are significantly complicated by the assumption of internal heterogeneity. We study the implications of this assumption for each sideÆs ability to attain a cooperative agreement and maintain that agreement in the face of violent opposition.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon H. McCormick & Guillermo Owen, 2004. "Factionalsim, Violence and Bargaining in Civil Wars," Homo Oeconomicus, Institute of SocioEconomics, vol. 20, pages 361-390.
  • Handle: RePEc:hom:homoec:v:20:y:2004:p:361-390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hom:homoec:v:20:y:2004:p:361-390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sohamde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.