IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hom/homoec/v14y1997p357-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Concept of Open Network Provision in Large Technical Systems

Author

Listed:
  • G³nter Knieps

    (Institute of Transportation Economics and Regional Policy, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitõt, Freiburg, Germany)

Abstract

This paper is a disagreed approach to network regulation is provided. The question is analyzed to what extent interconnection/access problems can be solved by voluntary market contract of the parties involved and to what extent government interventions should be implemented. The key concept is the identification of monopolistic bottlenecks where market power can be identified ex ante. In all other parts of large technical systems regulatory interventions are detrimental. Possible fallacies with respect to regulations of monopolistic bottlenecks (inadequate price-setting rules, extending regulatory basis) are pointed out.

Suggested Citation

  • G³nter Knieps, 1997. "The Concept of Open Network Provision in Large Technical Systems," Homo Oeconomicus, Institute of SocioEconomics, vol. 14, pages 357-369.
  • Handle: RePEc:hom:homoec:v:14:y:1997:p:357-369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:ces:ifodic:v:3:y:2005:i:4:p:14567573 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Günter Knieps, 2005. "Railway (De-)regulation in Germany," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 3(04), pages 21-25, January.
    3. Brunekreeft, Gert, 1997. "Local versus global price cap: A comparison of foreclosure incentives," Discussion Papers 36, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hom:homoec:v:14:y:1997:p:357-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sohamde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.