IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlnrp/847626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture between Charge and Noncharge Nurses: Implications for Effectiveness Outcomes Research

Author

Listed:
  • Deleise Wilson
  • Richard W. Redman
  • AkkeNeel Talsma
  • Michelle Aebersold

Abstract

The implementation of evidence-based practice guidelines can be influenced by nurses’ perceptions of the organizational safety culture. Shift-by-shift management of each nursing unit is designated to a subset of staff nurses (charge nurses), whom are often recruited as champions for change. The findings indicate that compared to charge nurses, noncharge nurses were more positive about overall perceptions of safety ( 𠑃 = . 0 5 ) and teamwork ( 𠑃 < . 0 5 ). Among charge nurses, significant differences were observed based on the number of years’ experience in charge: perception of teamwork within units [ ð ¹ ( 3 , 3 6 5 ) = 3 . 5 2 , 𠑃 < . 0 1 ]; overall perceptions of safety, [ ð ¹ ( 3 , 3 6 5 ) = 4 . 2 0 , 𠑃 < . 0 5 ]; safety grade for work area [ ð ¹ ( 3 , 3 6 0 ) = 2 . 6 1 , 𠑃 < . 0 5 ]; number of events reported within the last month [ ð ¹ ( 3 , 3 6 2 ) = 3 . 4 9 , 𠑃 < . 0 5 ]. These findings provide important insights to organizational contextual factors that may impact effectiveness outcomes research in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Deleise Wilson & Richard W. Redman & AkkeNeel Talsma & Michelle Aebersold, 2012. "Differences in Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture between Charge and Noncharge Nurses: Implications for Effectiveness Outcomes Research," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-7, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlnrp:847626
    DOI: 10.1155/2012/847626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/NRP/2012/847626.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/NRP/2012/847626.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2012/847626?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eugene C. Rich & Ann C. Bonham & Darrell G. Kirch, "undated". "The Implications of Comparative Effectiveness Research for Academic Medicine," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 1469da870e4d471cbc4326923, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlnrp:847626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.