IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlmpe/9646303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risky Multicriteria Group Decision Making Based on Cloud Prospect Theory and Regret Feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Song
  • Hao Yao
  • Shuang Yao
  • Donghua Yu
  • Yan Shen

Abstract

The assessment of risky linguistic variables has significant applications in multiattribute group decision problems. This paper focuses on risky multicriteria group decision making using linguistic variable assessment and proposes a new model which considers various and differential psychological behavior and the ambiguity of linguistic variable assessment across multicriteria risks. Based on the cloud prospect value assessment, this paper proposes a cloud prospect value aggregation method and consensus degree measurement. An improved feedback adjustment mechanism based on regret theory is employed as the consistency model, which complements prospect theory. The three theoretical methods together constitute the core elements of the proposed CPD (cloud prospect value consensus degree decision) model. The feasibility and validity of the new decision making model are demonstrated with a numerical example, and feedback performance was compared with conventional direct feedback. The proposed CPD approach satisfies given consistency threshold of 0.95 and 0.98 after three and four feedback loops, respectively. Compared to the proposed CPD method, direct feedback approach needs seven and ten feedback loops under the same threshold, respectively, which shows that the proposed model increases efficiency and accuracy of group decision making and significantly reduces time cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Song & Hao Yao & Shuang Yao & Donghua Yu & Yan Shen, 2017. "Risky Multicriteria Group Decision Making Based on Cloud Prospect Theory and Regret Feedback," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:9646303
    DOI: 10.1155/2017/9646303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/MPE/2017/9646303.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/MPE/2017/9646303.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2017/9646303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:9646303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.