IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlmpe/7237486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Adequacy of Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility Study Using a Monte Carlo Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Chunghun Ha
  • David S. Kim
  • SeJoon Park

Abstract

ANOVA gauge repeatability and reproducibility study is the most popular tool for measurement system analysis. Two experimental designs can be applied depending on the durability of the objects. If repeated measurements are possible or sufficient homogeneous nonrepeatable samples are available, crossed design is appropriate; otherwise, nested design should be used. In this paper, we investigated the adequacy of ANOVA gauge repeatability and reproducibility study from the perspective of practitioners. We proposed a Monte Carlo simulation that is close to the realistic procedure to evaluate the adequacy of both structures. During the evaluation, we considered the average performance metrics, percentage of correct decision, histogram shape, and symmetric mean absolute percentage error for the four popular performance metrics, namely, % Study Variation, % Contribution, % Tolerance, and the number of distinct categories. The experimental results show that the nested design fails to judge the precision of the gauge while the crossed design succeeds.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunghun Ha & David S. Kim & SeJoon Park, 2017. "Assessment of the Adequacy of Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility Study Using a Monte Carlo Simulation," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:7237486
    DOI: 10.1155/2017/7237486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/MPE/2017/7237486.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/MPE/2017/7237486.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2017/7237486?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:7237486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.