IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlmpe/5683525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Nearer, the Better? The Impact of Cultural and Geographic Distance on Crowdfunding Project Attractiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Fan
  • Teng Gao
  • Shuman Liu

Abstract

Information asymmetry between backers and project creators impedes the crowdfunding success. Consequently, creators usually rely on various information to alleviate information asymmetry. Particularly, the location information of both backers and creators embodies their geographic and cultural distance, which may affect crowdfunding project attractiveness. Whereas current literature almost ignores the role cultural distance in crowdfunding, this research focuses on the reward-based crowdfunding, so that it becomes salient to form the appreciation and judgment of the innovative, creative, or artistic nature of projects. Meanwhile, geographic distance is examined to join the debates between flat world hypothesis and home bias proposition. A series of econometric models are examined based on a sample of 264 fundraising projects collected from Kitckstarter.com through Python program. Results show that cultural distance exerts a U-shape effect, which initially impedes the crowdfunding performance but promote projects when large enough. Geographic distance generally exerts insignificant impact on crowdfunding performance. Furthermore, cultural and geographic distance exerts the asymmetric effects on experienced versus new backers. This article underscores the important implications of cultural distance on reward-based crowdfunding. By showing the differential effects of cultural and geographic distance on experience versus new backers, it empirically infers the social capital as the underlying mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Fan & Teng Gao & Shuman Liu, 2021. "The Nearer, the Better? The Impact of Cultural and Geographic Distance on Crowdfunding Project Attractiveness," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:5683525
    DOI: 10.1155/2021/5683525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/MPE/2021/5683525.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/MPE/2021/5683525.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2021/5683525?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:5683525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.