IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlmpe/4144254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Arab and Malay Students’ Attitudes toward Statistics and Their Learning Styles: A Rasch Measurement Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Aisha Fayomi
  • Zamalia Mahmud
  • Ali Algarni
  • Abdullah M. Almarashi
  • Naeem Jan

Abstract

Students’ learning of statistics has been studied from a variety of angles, and this study is no different. The main purpose is to compare the Malay and Arab students’ attitudes toward learning statistics and their learning styles in understanding statistics. A survey questionnaire and face-to-face interview techniques were used to elicit information from 150 students based on the cohort. They were asked about how they learn to solve statistical problems based on Kolb’s four learning cycles: feeling, reflective observation, thinking, and doing. Attitude responses were numerically recorded based on a five-point Likert scale, while preference for learning styles was recorded as 1 (Do and Feel) or 0 (Watch and Think). Both attitude and learning style data were combined and subjected to Rasch analysis. Results show that a majority of the Arab and Malay students have moderate to high positive attitude toward learning statistics. Generally, students from both cultures are classified as the “Accommodating†type with a preference for doing and feeling from the experience of doing statistical problems. Arab students are classified as the “Assimilating†type with a preference for thinking, reflecting, and learning from observation, while Malay students are classified as the “Converging†type with a preference for thinking and doing statistical exercises.

Suggested Citation

  • Aisha Fayomi & Zamalia Mahmud & Ali Algarni & Abdullah M. Almarashi & Naeem Jan, 2022. "Arab and Malay Students’ Attitudes toward Statistics and Their Learning Styles: A Rasch Measurement Approach," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:4144254
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/4144254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2022/4144254.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2022/4144254.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/4144254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:4144254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.