IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlmpe/3893129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Improved Uncertainty Measure Theory Based on Game Theory Weighting

Author

Listed:
  • Hujun He
  • Chong Tian
  • Gang Jin
  • Le An

Abstract

In the application of uncertainty measure theory, the determination method of index weight mainly includes the subjective weight determination method and the objective weight determination method. The subjective weight determination method has the disadvantages affected by the subjective preference of the decision-maker. The objective weight determination method often ignores the participation degree of the decision-maker, and when using the uncertainty measure evaluation model to perform multi-index classification evaluation, the credible degree recognition criterion is often used as the attribute recognition of the object to be measured, because the credible degree is taken by the subjective people, and the different values of different people have a great influence on the evaluation results. In order to solve the above problems in the uncertainty measure theory, this paper used the combination weighting of game theory to determine the optimal weight. At the same time, the credible degree recognition criterion was improved on the basis of the concept of minimum uncertainty measure distance, and a game theory-improved uncertainty measure optimization model was proposed. Finally, the validity of the model was proven by a case.

Suggested Citation

  • Hujun He & Chong Tian & Gang Jin & Le An, 2019. "An Improved Uncertainty Measure Theory Based on Game Theory Weighting," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-8, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:3893129
    DOI: 10.1155/2019/3893129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/MPE/2019/3893129.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/MPE/2019/3893129.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2019/3893129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:3893129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.