IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlmpe/2757779.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Maritime Boundary Delimitation Schemes Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method

Author

Listed:
  • Degang Wang
  • Dongling Li
  • Yujuan Dou
  • Yonghua Tan
  • Zhenke Zhang
  • Dui’an Lv
  • Jie Cheng
  • Naeem Jan

Abstract

The basic science region of marine management boundary lines among different provinces within the extent at least of the territorial sea is of great means to promote the sustainable growth of China's marine economy. There are 11 provinces along the coastal regions of the Chinese Mainland, and the scientific division of marine management boundaries among different provinces within the extents of the territorial sea is of great importance in promoting the sustainability of China's marine economy. We conducted a case study of maritime boundary demarcation between Jiangsu and Shandong Provinces, and a fuzzy evaluation index system with 14 indices in three subsets was developed to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of maritime boundary delimitation, determine the optimal scheme, and address shortages in the current evaluation indicators and evaluation methods. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the entropy weight method were used to calculate the combined weights of indices. Three maritime border delimitation schemes, namely, the historical boundary delimitation scheme, angle bisector delimitation scheme, and equidistance delimitation scheme, were evaluated using the comprehensive evaluation indices. Results show that the equidistance delimitation scheme is relatively superior to the two other schemes. The evaluation index is 0.504761, and the evaluation grade is “good.†The second best delimitation scheme is the angle bisector. The grade is “moderate,†and the evaluation index is 0.361641. The most ineffective boundary delimitation scheme is the historical one. The grade is “bad,†and the evaluation index is 0.135345. More consideration should be given to people's livelihoods and the safeguarding of national marine rights and interests in the late optimization of maritime boundary delimitation schemes. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation technique based on AHP-entropy weight can help decision-makers choose the optimum scheme by providing a quantitative top-down sequence of schemes in terms of quality and solving estimate difficulties in maritime boundary delimitation schemes. As a result, it has a wide range of applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Degang Wang & Dongling Li & Yujuan Dou & Yonghua Tan & Zhenke Zhang & Dui’an Lv & Jie Cheng & Naeem Jan, 2022. "Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Maritime Boundary Delimitation Schemes Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:2757779
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/2757779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2022/2757779.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2022/2757779.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/2757779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun Shen & Xiaoxue Ma & Weiliang Qiao, 2022. "A Model to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Maritime Shipping Risk Mitigation System by Entropy-Based Capability Degradation Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-34, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:2757779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.