IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlmpe/207469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Belief Rule-Based Safety Evaluation Approach for Complex Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Zhang
  • Jiang Jiang
  • Yingwu Chen
  • Kewei Yang

Abstract

Plenty of hazards underlie complex systems, which have negative effects on the normal functionality of engineering events. To minimize the uncertainty, a comprehensive preevent checkout is necessarily required to judge if the engineering events will be carried out successfully under current circumstance, through which further improvements can be made. A generic belief rule-based safety evaluation approach for large-scale complex systems is proposed. The overall system is firstly decomposed and filtered into the measurable attributes that may potentially contribute to uncertainty. Belief structure is then applied to measure the uncertainty of vagueness and incompleteness and represent heterologous information in a unified scheme. With this scheme, a rule base is established with all antecedents, consequents, and attributes presented in belief degrees, which is used to determine the relationship between attributes, aggregate the influences, and generate the final inference with evidential reasoning algorithm. In the end, an estimation of uncertainty is achieved in the representation of distribution. It describes how the systems perform with given conditions and sources. A numeric case in aerospace program is provided for feasibility illustration.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Zhang & Jiang Jiang & Yingwu Chen & Kewei Yang, 2015. "A Belief Rule-Based Safety Evaluation Approach for Complex Systems," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-10, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:207469
    DOI: 10.1155/2015/207469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/MPE/2015/207469.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/MPE/2015/207469.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2015/207469?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:207469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.