IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnddns/8017510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New JLS-Factor Model versus the Standard JLS Model: A Case Study on Chinese Stock Bubbles

Author

Listed:
  • Zongyi Hu
  • Chao Li

Abstract

In this paper, we extend the Johansen-Ledoit-Sornette (JLS) model by introducing fundamental economic factors in China (including the interest rate and deposit reserve rate) and the historical volatilities of targeted and US equity indices into the original model, which is a flexible tool to detect bubbles and predict regime changes in financial markets. We then derive a general method to incorporate these selected factors in addition to the log-periodic power law signature of herding and compare the prediction accuracy of the critical time between the original and the new JLS models (termed the JLS-factor model) by applying these two models to fit two well-known Chinese stock indices in three bubble periods. The results show that the JLS-factor model with Chinese characteristics successfully depicts the evolutions of bubbles and “antibubbles” and constructs efficient end-of-bubble signals for all bubbles in Chinese stock markets. In addition, the results of standard statistical tests demonstrate the excellent explanatory power of these additive factors and confirm that the new JLS model provides useful improvements over the standard JLS model.

Suggested Citation

  • Zongyi Hu & Chao Li, 2017. "New JLS-Factor Model versus the Standard JLS Model: A Case Study on Chinese Stock Bubbles," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnddns:8017510
    DOI: 10.1155/2017/8017510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/DDNS/2017/8017510.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/DDNS/2017/8017510.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2017/8017510?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnddns:8017510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.