IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnddns/1227657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weighting of Basic Indices for Value for Money Qualitative Evaluation of the Public-Private Partnership Aged Care Project through the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Author

Listed:
  • Song Ye
  • Ying Chen
  • Guangao Mao
  • Daqing Gong

Abstract

The evaluation of value for money (VFM) is an essential part of the pre-evaluation of public-private partnership (PPP) projects in China. It can be divided into qualitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation. However, there is no uniform weighting criterion for the indices of qualitative evaluation. To reasonably weigh the qualitative evaluation indices, this paper sorts and measures these indices through the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), using the public data on preapplied PPP aged care projects, and obtains the reference values. On this basis, several suggestions were put forward to standardize and develop VFM evaluation of PPP aged care projects, such as improve the scientific VFM evaluation system and realize whole-process performance appraisal. Based on actual project data, the qualitative evaluation is more objective than the analysis based on subjective experience. Therefore, our findings promote the application of VFM qualitative evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Song Ye & Ying Chen & Guangao Mao & Daqing Gong, 2021. "Weighting of Basic Indices for Value for Money Qualitative Evaluation of the Public-Private Partnership Aged Care Project through the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-6, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnddns:1227657
    DOI: 10.1155/2021/1227657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ddns/2021/1227657.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ddns/2021/1227657.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2021/1227657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnddns:1227657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.