IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/complx/6667187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Analysis of Opinion Evolution and Control Based on the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game in Social Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Xianyong Li
  • Jian Zhu
  • Yajun Du
  • Qian Zhang
  • Chenquan Gan

Abstract

In a social network, a user is greatly influenced by their neighbors’ opinions, and the user’s opinion updating can be regarded as the prisoner’s dilemma game. In view of such considerations, this paper proposes an opinion evolution and control model based on the prisoner’s dilemma game and gives the corresponding opinion evolution and control algorithm. Under different initial positive opinion proportions, different opinion control levels, and the same control threshold value and under different initial positive opinion proportions, different opinion control levels, and different opinion control threshold values in a scale-free network, the experiments illustrate the opinion evolution trends and control strategies according to the measures of changing the opinion control levels and opinion control threshold values for network regulators. The experiments show that the lower the initial positive opinion proportion is and the smaller (resp., larger) the control opinion threshold value chosen by the network regulators is, the lower (resp., higher) the opinion control level is; the larger the initial positive opinion proportion is and the larger the control opinion threshold value chosen by the network regulators is, the lower the opinion control level is.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianyong Li & Jian Zhu & Yajun Du & Qian Zhang & Chenquan Gan, 2021. "The Analysis of Opinion Evolution and Control Based on the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game in Social Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:complx:6667187
    DOI: 10.1155/2021/6667187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/complexity/2021/6667187.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/complexity/2021/6667187.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2021/6667187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:complx:6667187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.