IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/complx/6530847.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Game Mechanism of Individual Value Decision-Making Based on SVO Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Xu Shi
  • Lu-yun Qiu
  • Zhi-geng Fang
  • Xia-qing Liu
  • Yang-yang Du

Abstract

As the externalized carrier of intrinsic value, value decision-making is an important factor affecting the social value system. As an old Chinese saying goes, “A friend in need is a friend indeed,” crisis environment provides the background for the conflicts of multiple values, while individual social value orientation (SVO) determines the ranking of the value states. This paper defined the SVO types by means of Slider Measure method on the basis of environment description, constructed a decision-making game model in accordance with SVO differences, and finally analysed the mechanism of people’s decision-making. Taking the epidemic situation as the background, this paper conducted an empirical analysis with the sample of college students. The results showed that the most SVO types of college students were prosocial orientation, followed by individualistic orientation, altruistic orientation, and competitive orientation. In the crisis environment, individual SVO type and decision-making constituted a mapping relationship. There was an equilibrium point in the decision of prosocial orientation, and the dominant decision of altruistic orientation or individualistic orientation is relatively stable.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu Shi & Lu-yun Qiu & Zhi-geng Fang & Xia-qing Liu & Yang-yang Du, 2020. "A Game Mechanism of Individual Value Decision-Making Based on SVO Differences," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:complx:6530847
    DOI: 10.1155/2020/6530847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/8503/2020/6530847.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/8503/2020/6530847.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2020/6530847?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:complx:6530847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.