IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/complx/5302302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Hesitation of Anxious Traders in an Agent-Based Model

Author

Listed:
  • Bao-Jun Tang
  • Kun-Ben Lin
  • Jing-Bo Huang
  • Hung-Wen Lin
  • Dehua Shen

Abstract

Anxiety prevails in financial markets. In accordance with psychological research, anxious traders’ hesitant behavior differs from the frequently dissected herding and speculative behaviors. This paper examines the interactions between agent anxiety and price inertia in an artificial financial market. We incorporate an evolutionary mechanism to analyze the strategic benefit of the boundedly rational anxious agent. According to our simulation results, deviations in asset prices from their fundamentals increase with the behavioral hesitation of the anxious agent. The investment rigidity from the anxious agent’s lack of confidence mitigates the possibility of price reversal. Moreover, the average strategic benefit of the anxious agent is close to zero. To ensure the reliability of our finding, we further include the irrationality of the anxious agent in our evolutionary setting. Such an endeavor again demonstrates that the strategic benefit of the fundamentalist agent is inferior to that of the anxious agent. Since the anxious agent is characterized by an intolerance for uncertainty, we also investigate the artificial market under various degrees of risk aversion. We perceive that it is less possible for price reversal to emerge when considering higher levels of hesitation. The behavioral hesitation of the anxious agent enables the agent to cleverly evade the risk raised by the speculator.

Suggested Citation

  • Bao-Jun Tang & Kun-Ben Lin & Jing-Bo Huang & Hung-Wen Lin & Dehua Shen, 2022. "The Hesitation of Anxious Traders in an Agent-Based Model," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:complx:5302302
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/5302302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/complexity/2022/5302302.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/complexity/2022/5302302.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/5302302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:complx:5302302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.