IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/complx/1616116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of Some Point Process Models for Dynamic Networks

Author

Listed:
  • S. Haleh S. Dizaji
  • Saeid Pashazadeh
  • Javad Musevi Niya
  • Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda

Abstract

Modeling dynamic networks has attracted much interest in recent years, which helps understand networks’ behavior. Many works have been dedicated to modeling discrete-time networks, but less work is done for continuous-time networks. Point processes as powerful tools for modeling discrete events in continuous time have been widely used for modeling events over networks and their dynamics. These models have solid mathematical assumptions, making them interpretable but decreasing their generalizability for different datasets. Hence, neural point processes were introduced that don’t have strong assumptions on generative functions. However, these models can be impractical in the case of a large number of event types. This research presents a comparative study of different point process (Hawkes) models for continuous-time networks. Furthermore, a previously introduced neural point process (neural Hawkes) model is applied for modeling network interactions. In this work, network clustering is used for specifying interaction types. These methods are compared using different synthetic and real-world datasets, and their efficiency is evaluated on these datasets. The experiments represent that each model is appropriate for a group of datasets. In addition, the effect of clustering on results is discussed, and experiments for different clusters are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Haleh S. Dizaji & Saeid Pashazadeh & Javad Musevi Niya & Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda, 2022. "A Comparative Study of Some Point Process Models for Dynamic Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:complx:1616116
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/1616116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/complexity/2022/1616116.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/complexity/2022/1616116.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/1616116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:complx:1616116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.