IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gok/arviv1/v55y2013i3p252-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Team Capital and Productivity: Effect of Unit Specific Nursing Care on Patient Outcome

Author

Listed:
  • T Lakshmanasamy

Abstract

Performance of an organisation depends on both tangible and intangible human capital of the workers, especially in hospital performance where work is performed by teams rather than individuals. Once a patient is treated by the physician, it is the job of the nursing staff which perform as a team to monitor the condition and recovery of the patient. The unit specific experience of nurses is critical for the critical care and speedy recovery of the patient. Yet, this form of team human capital is ignored as input in health production. This paper explores the effect of the unit specific human capital of the nursing staff measured by the average experience in specific units of a hospital on the duration of stay of patients in the unit using a unique unit level monthly panel data in a general hospital. The fixed effects panel estimates show that the average general human capital of the nurses increases the duration of stay of patients in the units, while the average unit level human capital of the nursing staff reduce their length of stay. This result implies that experienced nurses are extra cautious to ensure full recovery of patients, and the continuous unit level care by the specific nursing team reduces the post-treatment complications and ensures their better health condition. The intangible team specific human capital in specific units contributes to organisational performance.

Suggested Citation

  • T Lakshmanasamy, 2013. "Team Capital and Productivity: Effect of Unit Specific Nursing Care on Patient Outcome," Artha Vijnana, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, vol. 55(3), pages 252-271.
  • Handle: RePEc:gok:arviv1:v:55:y:2013:i:3:p:252-271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gok:arviv1:v:55:y:2013:i:3:p:252-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gipepin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.