IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/afjour/v40y2005i2p241-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fremde und Fremdheit in afrikanischen Gesellschaften: ein Vergleich von Mbuti, Dogon, Dyula und dem städtischen Senegal

Author

Listed:
  • Till Förster

Abstract

Der Umgang mit Fremden und Fremdheit kann höchst unterschiedlich sein. Dies hängt sowohl von allgemein anerkannten Interpretationsmustern - welche entscheiden, wer oder was "fremd" ist - als auch von der Alltagspraxis ab. Ein Vergleich von vier unterschiedlichen Gesellschaften bzw. gesellschaftlichen Milieus in Afrika zeigt, dass Fremde oft in die alltägliche Arbeit integriert werden. Dadurch lernen sie die Bedeutung der Grundzüge des Lebens in der anderen Gesellschaft kennen. Welche Grenzen eine solche Integration hat, wird schließlich durch den Vergleich mit einem modernen gesellschaftlichen Umfeld deutlich.

Suggested Citation

  • Till Förster, 2005. "Fremde und Fremdheit in afrikanischen Gesellschaften: ein Vergleich von Mbuti, Dogon, Dyula und dem städtischen Senegal," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 40(2), pages 241-266.
    • Handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:40:y:2005:i:2:p:241-266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:40:y:2005:i:2:p:241-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andreas Mehler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.