IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/afjour/v39y2004i3p335-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regenwaldkolonisation als Frontier-Prozess: Der Ituri-Wald in Nordost-Kongo (Zaire) 1985-1995

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Rösler

Abstract

This paper analyses the concept of the frontier in terms of its usefulness in representing migration processes on the periphery of settled regions in tropical rain forests. Empirical field methods developed to study such dynamic settlement expansion areas are discussed and applied to two typical forms of frontier narrative: the migration epic ("to-the-region approach"), and the frontier as an arena of intercultural contacts ("within-the-region approach"). Combined with the cultural-ecological notion of pre-adaptation, three characteristics which were originally defined to describe frontier processes in the Amazon can help to analyse the frontier processes in the Ituri forest of former north-eastern Zaire: competing groups, perceptions of land, and power structures. It is argued that all actors on the frontier act within an institutional vacuum which is primarily a function of the declining Zairian State. The economic interests and ambitions of the frontier actors appear to be relatively heterogeneous due to their different regional and cultural backgrounds. They tend to converge however in a common desire to achieve secure economic subsistence. The only global player on the scene, a conservation reserve, even finds itself forced to adapt to local circumstances, particularly as it becomes the involuntary target of informal economic activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Rösler, 2004. "Regenwaldkolonisation als Frontier-Prozess: Der Ituri-Wald in Nordost-Kongo (Zaire) 1985-1995," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 39(3), pages 335-357.
  • Handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:39:y:2004:i:3:p:335-357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:39:y:2004:i:3:p:335-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andreas Mehler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.