IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/afjour/v37y2002i3p287-309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politische Parteien und ihre Funktionen in afrikanischen Demokratien. Analysekonzept und empirische Befunde zu Botswana und Namibia

Author

Listed:
  • Christoph Emminghaus

Abstract

A representative democracy demands the existence of political parties. As long as there is no working multiparty system a democracy is not consolidated. But so far political parties in Africa did not take the centre stage in the debate on transformation processes. The article takes this gap as starting point and provides a concept for the analysis of political parties in Africa. For this purpose the argumentation is divided into two parts. The first part presents a theoretical concept for a functional analysis of political parties in Africa. The second part provides some findings on political parties in Botswana and Namibia. On the one hand a couple of similarities between parties in Botswana and Namibia exist. Maybe most noticeably is the weakness of opposition parties in both countries. On the other hand there are also some differences between both countries. While the party system in Namibia is still structured along ethnic or linguistic cleavages one can notice in Botswana a slight trend towards party competition along economic conflicts. This makes the alternation of power more likely, and is one main criteria of consolidation.

Suggested Citation

  • Christoph Emminghaus, 2002. "Politische Parteien und ihre Funktionen in afrikanischen Demokratien. Analysekonzept und empirische Befunde zu Botswana und Namibia," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 37(3), pages 287-309.
  • Handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:37:y:2002:i:3:p:287-309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:37:y:2002:i:3:p:287-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andreas Mehler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.