IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/afjour/v37y2002i2p109-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Ein Dialog der Taubstummen": Französische vs. britische Wahrnehmungen des Islam im spätkolonialen Westafrika

Author

Listed:
  • Rüdiger Seesemann

Abstract

This paper looks at the perception of Islam and Muslims in West Africa by French and British colonial administrators. It analyzes the political consequences this perception had, as well as its later repercussions on the post-colonial understanding of Islam in Africa. At the same time, this article offers the first comparative analysis of French and British Islamic policies. The case of the Tijâniyya Sufi order serves as the point of departure to show how the two colonial powers tried to make use of Muslims in order to achieve political control and to pursue their colonial interests. However, French and British administrators did not agree on who their enemies among the Muslims were, and each side cultivated its own idea of a "Franco-African" or a "British-African" Islam. The resulting "dialogue of the deaf-and-dumb" - as one French administrator put it - did not only lead to the failure of the Franco-British collaboration in the field of Muslim policy: it also helped many colonial views of Islam to persist as an obstacle for a deeper understanding of the evolution of Muslim societies in West Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Rüdiger Seesemann, 2002. ""Ein Dialog der Taubstummen": Französische vs. britische Wahrnehmungen des Islam im spätkolonialen Westafrika," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 37(2), pages 109-139.
  • Handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:37:y:2002:i:2:p:109-139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:37:y:2002:i:2:p:109-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andreas Mehler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.