Author
Listed:
- Moshe Sharabi
(Department of MA Studies in Organizational Development and Consulting, Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Mizra 1930600, Israel)
- Ilan Shdema
(Department of Human Services, Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Mizra 1930600, Israel)
- Doaa Manadreh
(Department of MA Studies in Organizational Development and Consulting, Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Mizra 1930600, Israel)
- Lubna Tannous-Haddad
(Department of Behavioral Sciences, Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Mizra 1930600, Israel)
Abstract
The participation of Muslim women in the Israeli labor force is very low and stems from them being part of a traditional patriarchal society where women (especially religious ones) are still expected to be homemakers. Additionally, previous governmental policy decisions hindered a wide integration of Muslim women into the labor market. This study examined the centrality of life domains for Muslim women according to their religiosity degree. A questionnaire concerning the relative centrality of work, family, community, religion, and leisure was distributed among 219 Muslim working women. The findings show that work was more central for traditional women compared to secular and religious ones, but secular women ranked the centrality of family first and work second, similarly to the ranking in various Western countries. By contrast, traditional and religious women ranked work first and family second. Additionally, secular women ranked the centrality of leisure and community higher than traditional and religious women. The Israeli case is relevant in this regard because, similar to other Western countries, most Muslims in Israel form a distinct ethnic group, characterized by lower socioeconomic status and subject to political marginalization. The results have both theoretical and practical significance.
Suggested Citation
Moshe Sharabi & Ilan Shdema & Doaa Manadreh & Lubna Tannous-Haddad, 2025.
"Muslim Working Women: The Effect of Cultural Values and Degree of Religiosity on the Centrality of Work, Family, and Other Life Domains,"
World, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:2:p:43-:d:1624568
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:2:p:43-:d:1624568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.