IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v4y2023i2p21-346d1161778.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Health Silk Road: A Double-Edged Sword? Assessing the Implications of China’s Health Diplomacy

Author

Listed:
  • Shaoyu Yuan

    (Division of Global Affairs, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 195 University Ave, Newark, NJ 07102, USA)

Abstract

The Health Silk Road (HSR) of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) of China aims to enhance public health and foster international cooperation in the healthcare sector. HSR objectives include strengthening healthcare infrastructure, expanding China’s global health leadership, and enhancing international health cooperation. The aim of this study was to examine the HSR and its implications for global health and international relations by using expert opinion analysis on known major HSR initiatives. We analyzed the objectives of HSR, including improving healthcare infrastructure, enhancing global health cooperation, and expanding China’s global health leadership. Additionally, as a case study, an in-depth analysis of the China-Pakistan collaboration on healthcare under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) was conducted. This research posits that the HSR has a mix of positive and negative implications. Positive impacts of HSR include improved healthcare services, infrastructure, and capacity-building in participating countries. The main challenges include the quality and sustainability of the infrastructure and services provided, debt sustainability, transparency of projects, and China’s geopolitical influence. This research identified five motives behind China’s HSR: economic interests, diplomatic influence, reputation building, regional stability, and health security. The summary centers on CPEC and the WHO/Global collaboration. This research contributes to a nuanced understanding of the HSR’s multifaceted impacts and underscores the importance of open dialogue, cooperation, and the sharing of best practices among stakeholders. By assessing the motives, implications, and concerns of the HSR, this study offers valuable insights for policymakers, global health practitioners, and scholars, highlighting the significance of international collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaoyu Yuan, 2023. "The Health Silk Road: A Double-Edged Sword? Assessing the Implications of China’s Health Diplomacy," World, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:4:y:2023:i:2:p:21-346:d:1161778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/4/2/21/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/4/2/21/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samina KHALIL*, 2017. "Research Notes Cpec: Mutually Beneficial Growth Opportunities For China And Pakistan," Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, Applied Economics Research Centre, vol. 27(1), pages 139-144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Assamah & Shaoyu Yuan, 2024. "Greenfield investment and job creation in Ghana: a sectorial analysis and geopolitical implications of Chinese investments," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:4:y:2023:i:2:p:21-346:d:1161778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.