IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v2y2021i2p18-301d561603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives on Sustainable Pesticide Control in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Tomaz Langenbach

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro—PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro 22541-041, Brazil)

  • Luiz Querino Caldas

    (Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal Fluminense—UFF, Niterói 24001-970, Brazil)

  • Tácio De Campos

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro—PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro 22541-041, Brazil)

  • Fábio Correia

    (Department of Natural Science, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro—UNIRIO, Av. Pasteur, 458, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 22290-240, Brazil)

  • Nelson Lorenz

    (Public Ministery, Florianópolis 88010-70, Brazil)

  • Daniele Marinho

    (Instituto Federal do Espírito Santo—IFES, Vitória 29056-264, Brazil)

  • Denise Mano

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro—PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro 22541-041, Brazil)

  • Luiz Claudio Meirelles

    (Centro de Estudos da Saúde do Trabalhador e Ecologia Humana—CESTEH, FIOCURZ, Rio de Janeiro 21041-210, Brazil)

  • Manildo Oliveira

    (Instituto Federal Fluminense—IFF, Cabo Frio 28293-660, Brazil)

  • Claudio Parente

    (Institute of Biophysics, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro—UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil)

  • João Paulo Torres

    (Institute of Biophysics, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro—UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil)

  • Leonardo Vicente

    (Pesticide Control Agency of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 200710-04, Brazil)

  • Eliana Vieira

    (Biological Institute of São Paulo, São Paulo 04014-002, Brazil)

Abstract

If the current policy explores the utilization of active ingredients in use quickly and to the maximum, the same does not occur with the ban on the registration of products highly dangerous to both health and the environment. The current policy does not aim at reducing pesticide toxicity and ecotoxicity, required to reduce environmental contamination and human exposure. To this end, it is essential to adjust scientific evaluation parameters concerning lower concentration tolerance limits to modernity standards, in addition to banning products for which there is scientific evidence of carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic actions. In ecotoxicology, reducing the applicable concentration limits is paramount for preserving bees, birds, and other forms of domestic and wildlife. When evaluating active ingredients, it is imperative to prioritize more biodegradable molecules with low potential for environmental mobilization through volatilization and leaching, preserving both air and water quality. Another goal, among others, is a program for the generalized reduction of successfully implemented in several countries. Brazil, a tropical agriculture leader, should stand out by incorporating sustainability while preserving both health and the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomaz Langenbach & Luiz Querino Caldas & Tácio De Campos & Fábio Correia & Nelson Lorenz & Daniele Marinho & Denise Mano & Luiz Claudio Meirelles & Manildo Oliveira & Claudio Parente & João Paulo Torr, 2021. "Perspectives on Sustainable Pesticide Control in Brazil," World, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-7, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:2:y:2021:i:2:p:18-301:d:561603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/2/2/18/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/2/2/18/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lopes Soares, Wagner & Firpo de Souza Porto, Marcelo, 2009. "Estimating the social cost of pesticide use: An assessment from acute poisoning in Brazil," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 2721-2728, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tolhurst, Tor N. & DeMars, Christopher & Klonsky, Karen & Goodhue, Rachael E. & Zhang, Minghua, 2017. "Are Farmers Good Neighbors? Self-Regulation of Pesticide Applications near Schools and Daycares in California," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258393, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. José Sobreiro Filho & Enzo Barberio Mariano & Vinicius Amorim Sobreiro & Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour, 2016. "Beyond the Agrarian Reform Policies in Brazil: An Empirical Study of Brazilian States from 1995 Through 2011," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(3), pages 1093-1114, December.
    3. Alam, Shamma Adeeb & Wolff, Hendrik, 2016. "Do Pesticide Sellers Make Farmers Sick? Health, Information, and Adoption of Technology in Bangladesh," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(1), pages 1-34, January.
    4. Komarek, Adam M. & De Pinto, Alessandro & Smith, Vincent H., 2020. "A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Skidmore, Marin & Sims, Kaitlyn M. & Gibbs, Holly & Rausch, Lisa, 2021. "Health, climate, and agriculture: A case study of childhood cancer in Brazil’s Amazon and Cerrado biomes," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313872, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Ghislain B. D. Aïhounton & Arne Henningsen & Neda Trifkovic, 2021. "Pesticide Handling and Human Health: Conventional and Organic Cotton Farming in Benin," IFRO Working Paper 2021/06, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    7. Abedullah & Ali, Haseeb & Kouser, Shahzad, 2012. "Pesticide or Wastewater, Which One is Bigger Culprit for Acute Health Symptoms among Vegetable Growers in Pakistan’s Punjab," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126598, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Huaquan Zhang & Zhenyao Yang & Yidan Wang & Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Abbas Ali Chandio, 2023. "Impact of Agricultural Mechanization Level on Farmers’ Health Status in Western China: Analysis Based on CHARLS Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Lobo, Gustavo D. & De Souza Almeida, Felipe M. & Danelon, André F. & Rocha, Adauto B. & Almeida, Alexandre N., 2020. "Could the agrochemical poisoning increase suicide attempts in the Brazilian rural areas? An econometric approach using spatial analysis methods," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304593, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Kouser, Shahzad & Qaim, Matin, 2011. "Impact of Bt cotton on pesticide poisoning in smallholder agriculture: A panel data analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 2105-2113, September.
    11. Christos A. Damalas & Ilias G. Eleftherohorinos, 2011. "Pesticide Exposure, Safety Issues, and Risk Assessment Indicators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Yitian Shao & Jianwei Ni & Shengjia Zhou & Yiping Wang & Xuanxuan Jin, 2024. "Safety assessment of agricultural products and the pesticide regulation trend in China," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:2:y:2021:i:2:p:18-301:d:561603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.