Author
Listed:
- Maoxin Zhang
(College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China
Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, China Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100081, China)
- Jing Zhang
(Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, China Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100081, China
These authors contributed equally to this paper.)
- Mingguo Liu
(College of Forestry, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China)
- Liping Guo
(Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, China Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100081, China)
- Fawang Ma
(College of Economics and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China)
- Liyong Xie
(College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China)
- Minggang Xu
(Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, China Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100081, China)
- Anping Yun
(Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, China Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100081, China)
Abstract
The Phaeozem region is an important grain production base in China and soil fertility has declined under long-term cultivation. Studying soil organic carbon (SOC) change in the upland phaeozem of Northeast China under different tillage modes has great theoretical and practical significance for reducing greenhouse gases emissions, increasing soil carbon stocks, and ensuring food security. This study applied the DAYCENT model to simulate six long-term experimental sites in the phaeozem region, and through calibration and validation analysis, it concluded that the DAYCENT model could effectively simulate the dynamic change of SOC in the upland phaeozems; hence, the relevant parameters of each site were determined. Under future climate scenarios (Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5, RCP 4.5), SOC change in agricultural soils (0–20 cm topsoil) of four different management scenarios (fertilizer application, manure amendment, straw return, no-tillage) was simulated. The overall simulated trend was no-tillage > straw return > manure amendment > fertilizer application. Fertilizer had no evident effect on increasing SOC, but the effect would be better if combined with manure; both straw return and no-tillage had the general effect of improving SOC and the simulated values rose rapidly with a large increasing rate within a short period; however, the increasing rate became gentle after 2050, reached a relatively stable level after 2080, then gradually reached carbon saturation. Untill 2100, the SOC content of each site reached a relatively higher level by adopting the no-tillage treatment, where the SOC contents of Harbin, Hailun, Nehe, Dehui, Gongzhuling and Lishu were 2.36 g/100 g, 2.81 g/100 g, 2.22 g/100 g, 2.38 g/100 g, 1.97 g/100 g and 2.01 g/100 g, respectively. The SOC contents increased by 52.47% when compared with the initial value, and the simulated average annual increase of SOC for 84 years was 0.0082 g/100 g.
Suggested Citation
Maoxin Zhang & Jing Zhang & Mingguo Liu & Liping Guo & Fawang Ma & Liyong Xie & Minggang Xu & Anping Yun, 2017.
"Simulation on the Future Change of Soil Organic Carbon from Phaeozems under Different Management Practices in Northeast China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:7:p:1129-:d:102934
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:7:p:1129-:d:102934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.