IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i4p537-d94623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coherences and Differences among EU, US and PRC Approaches for Rural Urban Development: Interscalar and Interdisciplinary Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto De Lotto

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, DICAr, University of Pavia, via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

  • Tiziano Cattaneo

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, DICAr, University of Pavia, via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

  • Emanuele Giorgi

    (Escuela de Arquitectura y Diseño, División de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus León, Av. Eugenio Garza Sada S/N, Cerro Gordo, 37190 León, Mexico)

  • Elisabetta M. Venco

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, DICAr, University of Pavia, via Ferrata 3, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is to translate the indexing of a projects’ Data Base, based on EU vocabulary on rural urban development, into different lexicons. Built on the groundwork laid in previous researches, the authors want to enlarge the methodology applied in European Union (EU) territory and defined with Rural Architectural Intensification (RAI) and Rural Architectural Urbanism (RAU) to other contexts, in particular People’s Republic of China (PRC) and United States (US), keeping, however, this research at theoretical and methodological definition level. The study of coherences and differences between EU, US and China for rural urban development implies an interscalar and interdisciplinary analysis approach. It must be in complete adherence with national and specific directives and objectives in all the different selected countries. The analysis of main literature and national and federal laws of Europe, United States and China allows the definition of the Strategic Objectives and Main Goals for Rural Development identifying indicators and criteria. They permit to measure intensification’s outcomes in a qualitative way through the description and interpretation of operative tools for architecture and landscape design. Finally, the organized database and the territorial results can be considered as guidelines to support decision makers in rural-urban context. In addition, the whole procedure presented along with the projects’ database is a significant research package for further interdisciplinary applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto De Lotto & Tiziano Cattaneo & Emanuele Giorgi & Elisabetta M. Venco, 2017. "Coherences and Differences among EU, US and PRC Approaches for Rural Urban Development: Interscalar and Interdisciplinary Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:537-:d:94623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/4/537/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/4/537/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiziano Cattaneo & Roberto De Lotto & Elisabetta Maria Venco, 2016. "Functional Reuse and Intensification of Rural-Urban Context: Rural Architectural Urbanism," International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems (IJAEIS), IGI Global, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emanuele Giorgi & Tiziano Cattaneo & Minqing Ni & Renata Enríquez Alatriste, 2020. "Sustainability and Effectiveness of Chinese Outline for National Tourism and Leisure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-30, February.
    2. Jianwu Qi & Wei Li & Zongxiang Wang & Haozhou Fang, 2021. "Measurement and Path Selection of Rural Development Level in Enclave Areas: A Case Study of Jingyuan County, Gansu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Rongyu Wang & Rong Tan, 2018. "Rural Renewal of China in the Context of Rural-Urban Integration: Governance Fit and Performance Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Tiziano Cattaneo & Emanuele Giorgi & Mauricio Flores & Viviana Barquero, 2020. "Territorial Effects of Shared-Living Heritage Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-28, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:537-:d:94623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.