Author
Listed:
- Seongmin Kang
(Department of Environment & Energy, Sejong University, Seoul 143-747, Korea)
- Seungjin Kim
(Cooperate Course for Climate Change, Sejong University, Seoul 143-747, Korea)
- Deakyeom Lee
(Cooperate Course for Climate Change, Sejong University, Seoul 143-747, Korea)
- Jeongwoo Lee
(Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Sejong University, Seoul 143-747, Korea)
- Ki-Hyun Kim
(Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea)
- Eui-Chan Jeon
(Department of Environment & Energy, Sejong University, Seoul 143-747, Korea)
Abstract
In this study, to determine the biomass fraction to apply to the estimation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the waste incineration sector, municipal solid waste, industrial waste, and sewage sludge incineration facilities were selected and analyzed, and the biomass fractions found in these facilities were compared. The biomass fractions of Municipal solid waste, industrial waste, and sewage sludge in incineration facilities were shown to be 57%, 41%, and 78%, on average, respectively. In the case of municipal solid waste and industrial waste incineration facilities, the values were similar to those of previous studies. However, the biomass fraction of wastes and sewage sludge except for municipal solid waste was found to be significantly different from the IPCC default. Accordingly, we believe that the biomass fractions used to estimate the GHG emissions of different incineration facilities should reflect the characteristics of each waste type. At present, the basic value given by the IPCC for biomass fraction is used in Korea to estimate the GHG emissions of each waste incineration facility. Some studies have found a difference between the value obtained using the basic value given by the IPCC and the value obtained using values that reflect the characteristics of Korea. In common with previous studies, in this study the biomass fraction of waste incineration facilities and sewage sludge incineration facilities except for municipal solid wastes showed a large difference, which is also expected to affect the estimation of GHG emissions. If further studies collect additional data on the biomass fraction of each waste type, this study along with the additional data collected will assist in the development of a state level greenhouse gas emission factor and contribute to the improvement of the reliability of the national GHG inventory.
Suggested Citation
Seongmin Kang & Seungjin Kim & Deakyeom Lee & Jeongwoo Lee & Ki-Hyun Kim & Eui-Chan Jeon, 2017.
"The Study on Biomass Fraction Estimation for Waste Incinerated in Korea: A Case Study,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-9, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:511-:d:94286
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:511-:d:94286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.