IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i11p2093-d118848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural Complexity and Ecosystem Functions in a Natural Mixed Forest under a Single-Tree Selection Silviculture

Author

Listed:
  • Toshiya Yoshida

    (Uryu Experimental Forest, Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Prefecture 060-0808, Japan)

  • Sayoko Naito

    (Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 060-8589, Japan)

  • Misato Nagumo

    (Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 096-0071, Japan)

  • Natsumi Hyodo

    (Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 096-0071, Japan)

  • Taiki Inoue

    (Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 096-0071, Japan)

  • Hiromitsu Umegane

    (Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 096-0071, Japan)

  • Haruka Yamazaki

    (Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 096-0071, Japan)

  • Hisashi Miya

    (Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 060-8589, Japan)

  • Futoshi Nakamura

    (Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 060-8589, Japan)

Abstract

The objective of forest management has become broader, and it is essential to harmonize timber production with conservation of the forest ecosystem. Selection cutting is recognized as a major alternative of clear-cutting, because it can maintain the complexity and heterogeneity of a natural forest; however, its long-term evaluations are limited. This study compared various attributes of stand structures, which are indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem carbon stock between managed and unmanaged blocks (12.6 ha area in total) in a natural mixed forest in Hokkaido, the northernmost island of Japan. We found that 30 years’ implementation of single-tree selection did not affect the volume, size structure, species diversity nor spatial distribution of overstory trees in the managed stands. Also, the total carbon stock in the managed stands was almost equal to that of the unmanaged stands. In contrast, several structural attributes and indicator elements that are significant for biodiversity (such as large-diameter live trees, dead trees, cavities, epiphytic bryophytes, and some avian guilds) showed marked decrease in the managed stands. We conclude that it is required to leave these structures and elements to some extent for deriving the merit of the management as an alternative silvicultural regime in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Toshiya Yoshida & Sayoko Naito & Misato Nagumo & Natsumi Hyodo & Taiki Inoue & Hiromitsu Umegane & Haruka Yamazaki & Hisashi Miya & Futoshi Nakamura, 2017. "Structural Complexity and Ecosystem Functions in a Natural Mixed Forest under a Single-Tree Selection Silviculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:2093-:d:118848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/2093/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/2093/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zoran Govedar & Milun Krstić & Srđan Keren & Violeta Babić & Brane Zlokapa & Branko Kanjevac, 2018. "Actual and Balanced Stand Structure: Examples from Beech-Fir-Spruce Old-Growth Forests in the Area of the Dinarides in Bosnia and Herzegovina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:2093-:d:118848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.