IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i11p1938-d116296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design, Prototyping, and Assessment of a Wastewater Closed-Loop Recovery and Purification System

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Bortolini

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento, 2, Bologna 40136, Italy)

  • Mauro Gamberi

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento, 2, Bologna 40136, Italy)

  • Cristina Mora

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento, 2, Bologna 40136, Italy)

  • Francesco Pilati

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento, 2, Bologna 40136, Italy)

  • Alberto Regattieri

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento, 2, Bologna 40136, Italy)

Abstract

Efforts to decrease the water use within industry are mandatory to pursue product and process sustainability. Particularly, the European Union (EU) is at the top level for water consumption in industry, while some sectors, such as the food and beverage (F&B), are highly water-intensive with hundreds of liters per hour of consumed and, then, drained water. This article provides a systematic overview of the most innovative insights coming from an EU Eco-Innovation project dealing with greening the F&B industry through the design, prototyping, technical, economic, and environmental assessment of a wastewater closed-loop recovery and purification system. The system, tailored for a standard mid-size F&B company using 2–3 billion L/year of raw water, collects, purifies and recirculates the key produced wastewater streams with an overall recovery efficiency of about 56%. The proposed purification technology comes from the most efficient combination of membrane-based filtration methods, reverse osmosis (RO), and ultraviolet modules. Evidence from the technical design, full-scale on-site technology prototyping, net-present-value (NPV) analysis and system life-cycle-assessment (LCA) are presented concluding about the convenience of adopting the proposed solution to reduce costs and impacts on the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Bortolini & Mauro Gamberi & Cristina Mora & Francesco Pilati & Alberto Regattieri, 2017. "Design, Prototyping, and Assessment of a Wastewater Closed-Loop Recovery and Purification System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:1938-:d:116296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/1938/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/1938/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jared B. Fitzgerald & Daniel Auerbach, 2016. "The Political Economy of the Water Footprint: A Cross-National Analysis of Ecologically Unequal Exchange," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Philip Leat & Cesar Revoredo-Giha & Chrysa Lamprinopoulou, 2011. "Scotland’s Food and Drink Policy Discussion: Sustainability Issues in the Food Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-27, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simona Bungau & Delia Mirela Tit & Katalin Fodor & Gabriela Cioca & Maricel Agop & Ciprian Iovan & Delia Carmen Nistor Cseppento & Adrian Bumbu & Cristiana Bustea, 2018. "Aspects Regarding the Pharmaceutical Waste Management in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Edward Majewski & Adam Wąs & Svein Ole Borgen & Peter Csillag & Michele Donati & Richard Freeman & Viet Hoàng & Jean-Loup Lecoeur & Maria Cecilia Mancini & An Nguyen & Monia , 2019. "Measuring the Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability of Short Food Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Steven A. Mejia, 2023. "Global inequities in the prevalence of undernourishment," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(3), pages 329-344, May.
    3. Leat, Philip M.K. & Lamprinopoulou-Kranis, Chrysa & Revoredo-Giha, Cesar & Kupiec-Teahan, Beata, 2011. "Agri-food supply chains and sustainability-related issues: evidence from across the Scottish agri-food economy," Working Papers 109424, Scotland's Rural College (formerly Scottish Agricultural College), Land Economy & Environment Research Group.
    4. Shengnan Sun & Xinping Wang & Yan Zhang, 2017. "Sustainable Traceability in the Food Supply Chain: The Impact of Consumer Willingness to Pay," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Vibhas Sukhwani & Arie Nurzaman & Nadia Paramitha Kusumawardhani & Anwaar Mohammed AlHinai & Liu Hanyu & Rajib Shaw, 2019. "Enhancing Food Security by Institutionalizing Collaborative Food Alliances in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Guojing Li & Xinru Han & Qiyou Luo & Wenbo Zhu & Jing Zhao, 2021. "A Study on the Relationship between Income Change and the Water Footprint of Food Consumption in Urban China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Chih-Hao Wang & Hongwei Dong, 2017. "Responding to the Drought: A Spatial Statistical Approach to Investigating Residential Water Consumption in Fresno, California," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Katharina Biely & Dries Maes & Steven Van Passel, 2018. "Market Power Extended: From Foucault to Meadows," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Luca Tausch & Jeffrey Althouse, 2024. "Towards a theory of ecologically unequal exchange (EUE) as a multi-tiered hierarchy," FMM Working Paper 100-2024, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    10. Hekmatpour, Peyman & Leslie, Carrie McLachlin, 2022. "Ecologically unequal exchange and disparate death rates attributable to air pollution: A comparative study of 169 countries from 1991 to 2017," OSF Preprints racms, Center for Open Science.
    11. Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Kazancoglu, Yigit & Ekinci, Esra & Liu, Mengqi & Özbiltekin, Melisa & Sezer, Muruvvet Deniz, 2021. "Using system dynamics to analyze the societal impacts of blockchain technology in milk supply chainsrefer," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    12. Olk, Christopher, 2024. "How much a dollar cost: Currency hierarchy as a driver of ecologically unequal exchange," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Wei Li & Guomin Li & Rongxia Zhang & Wen Sun & Wen Wu & Baihui Jin & Pengfei Cui, 2017. "Carbon Reduction Potential of Resource-Dependent Regions Based on Simulated Annealing Programming Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Paola Caputo & Chiara Ducoli & Matteo Clementi, 2014. "Strategies and Tools for Eco-Efficient Local Food Supply Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Jesús Ramos-Martín & Fander Falconí & Pedro Cango, 2017. "The Concept of Caloric Unequal Exchange and Its Relevance for Food System Analysis: The Ecuador Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    16. Caracciolo, Francesco & Gorgitano, Maria Teresa & Lombardi, Pasquale & Sanino, Giuliana & Verneau, Fabio, 2011. "Responsibility and Sustainability in a Food Chain: A Priority Matrix Analysis," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2(3), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:1938-:d:116296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.