IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i9p930-d77977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Can Rural Communities Do to Be Sustained?

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel J. C. Chen

    (Center for Sustainable Business and Development, the University of Tennessee, 311 Conference Center Building, Knoxville, TN 37996-4134, USA)

Abstract

Since the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) was founded in 1965, various reports have been presented to summarize the progress in terms of economic development, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats among studied communities in the Appalachian region. The purposes of this study were to investigate (1) the condition and usage of facilities and services in the studied communities; (2) what factors contribute to local growth in improving areas; and (3) what barriers deter growth in the studied communities based on the perceptions of study participants. Ten studied counties were categorized based on their topography, demographics, and economics. Each sub-region has two selected counties (non-distressed and distressed) to represent and compare their similar topography and various stages of demographic opportunities and economic development and challenges. Location is recognized as one of the significant factors that affect communities’ development. Counties perform better when they are adjacent to urban areas, own major transportation corridors, and have more supplies of natural resources than those located in more rural areas with fewer resources. This study noted the need to improve communication infrastructure (such as Internet access, broadband, and mobile communications) that impact local development opportunities and public safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel J. C. Chen, 2016. "What Can Rural Communities Do to Be Sustained?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-11, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:9:p:930-:d:77977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/9/930/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/9/930/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oluleye, Gbemi & Allison, John & Hawker, Graeme & Kelly, Nick & Hawkes, Adam D., 2018. "A two-step optimization model for quantifying the flexibility potential of power-to-heat systems in dwellings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 215-228.
    2. Bilton, Penny & Jones, Geoff & Ganesh, Siva & Haslett, Steve, 2017. "Classification trees for poverty mapping," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 53-66.
    3. Ghosh, Sumita, 2021. "Urban agriculture potential of home gardens in residential land uses: A case study of regional City of Dubbo, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Kulam, Adam, 2021. "US Community Development Capital Initiative (CDCI)," Journal of Financial Crises, Yale Program on Financial Stability (YPFS), vol. 3(3), pages 786-820, April.
    5. Briggs, Ryan C., 2018. "Poor targeting: A gridded spatial analysis of the degree to which aid reaches the poor in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 133-148.
    6. Kerr, Sandy & Johnson, Kate & Weir, Stephanie, 2017. "Understanding community benefit payments from renewable energy development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 202-211.
    7. Phillips, Peter M. & João, Elsa, 2017. "Land use planning and the ecosystem approach: An evaluation of case study planning frameworks against the Malawi Principles," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 460-480.
    8. Velmurugan, Manivannan Senthil, 2017. "Sustainable perspectives on energy consumption, EMRF, environment, health and accident risks associated with the use of mobile phones," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 192-206.
    9. Kovács, András & Bátai, Roland & Csáji, Balázs Csanád & Dudás, Péter & Háy, Borbála & Pedone, Gianfranco & Révész, Tibor & Váncza, József, 2016. "Intelligent control for energy-positive street lighting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 40-51.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:9:p:930-:d:77977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.