IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i9p869-d76938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Urban Ecosystem Health Based on Entropy Weight Extension Decision Model in Urban Agglomeration

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Yang

    (School of Resource and Environment Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information System, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Aiwen Lin

    (School of Resource and Environment Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information System, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Zhenzhen Zhao

    (School of Resource and Environment Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information System, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Ling Zou

    (School of Resource and Environment Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information System, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Cheng Sun

    (School of Resource and Environment Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
    Key Laboratory of Geographic Information System, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Urban ecosystem health evaluation can assist in sustainable ecological management at a regional level. This study examined urban agglomeration ecosystem health in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River with entropy weight and extension theories. The model overcomes information omissions and subjectivity problems in the evaluation process of urban ecosystem health. Results showed that human capital and education, economic development level as well as urban infrastructure have a significant effect on the health states of urban agglomerations. The health status of the urban agglomeration’s ecosystem was not optimistic in 2013. The majority of the cities were unhealthy or verging on unhealthy, accounting for 64.52% of the total number of cities in the urban agglomeration. The regional differences of the 31 cities’ ecosystem health are significant. The cause originated from an imbalance in economic development and the policy guidance of city development. It is necessary to speed up the integration process to promote coordinated regional development. The present study will aid us in understanding and advancing the health situation of the urban ecosystem in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River and will provide an efficient urban ecosystem health evaluation method that can be used in other areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Yang & Aiwen Lin & Zhenzhen Zhao & Ling Zou & Cheng Sun, 2016. "Assessment of Urban Ecosystem Health Based on Entropy Weight Extension Decision Model in Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:9:p:869-:d:76938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/9/869/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/9/869/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Yangfan & Sun, Xiang & Zhu, Xiaodong & Cao, Huhua, 2010. "An early warning method of landscape ecological security in rapid urbanizing coastal areas and its application in Xiamen, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(19), pages 2251-2260.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiao, Lan & Haiping, Tang & Haoguang, Liang, 2017. "A theoretical framework for researching cultural ecosystem service flows in urban agglomerations," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 95-104.
    2. Baiqing Sun & Xin Ma & Martin de Jong & Xin Bao, 2019. "Assessment on Island Ecological Vulnerability to Urbanization: A Tale of Chongming Island, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Yonghua Zhao & Lei Zhang & Xia Jia & Qi Mu & Lei Han & Zhao Liu & Peng Zhang & Ming Zhao, 2023. "Pattern and Trend of Ecosystem Service Value in the Loess Plateau of Northern Shaanxi," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Xiaoxiao Ye & Yong Fan & Jing Miao & Zongyi He, 2022. "The Competitiveness of Regional Urban System in Hubei Province of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Xuefeng Xie & Lijie Pu, 2017. "Assessment of Urban Ecosystem Health Based on Matter Element Analysis: A Case Study of 13 Cities in Jiangsu Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Jingwei Wang & Jinhe Zhang & Peijia Wang & Xiaobin Ma & Liangjian Yang & Leying Zhou, 2022. "Progress in Ecosystem Health Research and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Ziwei Liu & Mingchang Wang & Xingnan Liu & Fengyan Wang & Xiaoyan Li & Jianguo Wang & Guanglei Hou & Shijun Zhao, 2023. "Ecological Security Assessment and Warning of Cultivated Land Quality in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiaxing Cui & Xuesong Kong & Jing Chen & Jianwei Sun & Yuanyuan Zhu, 2021. "Spatially Explicit Evaluation and Driving Factor Identification of Land Use Conflict in Yangtze River Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Dan Yu & Dongyan Wang & Wenbo Li & Shuhan Liu & Yuanli Zhu & Wenjun Wu & Yongheng Zhou, 2018. "Decreased Landscape Ecological Security of Peri-Urban Cultivated Land Following Rapid Urbanization: An Impediment to Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Xiangnan Fan & Yuning Cheng & Fangqi Tan & Tianyi Zhao, 2022. "Construction and Optimization of the Ecological Security Pattern in Liyang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Seyed Mostafa Hedayatnezhad Kashi & Saba Baharvandi, 2022. "The Assessment of Ecological Livability for Agricultural, Pasture, Forestry, Residential, and Tourism Activities; Study Area: North of Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-26, October.
    5. Chun-rong Zhao & Bo Zhou & Xin Su, 2014. "Evaluation of Urban Eco-Security—A Case Study of Mianyang City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Yiming Wei & Hongwei Wang & Bo Tan & Mengqi Xue & Yucong Yin, 2022. "Analysis of the Spatial Differentiation and Development Optimization of Towns’ Livable Quality in Aksu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Han, Baolong & Liu, Hongxiao & Wang, Rusong, 2015. "Urban ecological security assessment for cities in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei metropolitan region based on fuzzy and entropy methods," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 217-225.
    8. Xiaohui Liu & Yuan Zhang & Guihua Dong & Guanglei Hou & Ming Jiang, 2019. "Landscape Pattern Changes in the Xingkai Lake Area, Northeast China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-12, October.
    9. Hebing Zhang & Qingqing Yan & Fangfang Xie & Shouchen Ma, 2023. "Evaluation and Prediction of Landscape Ecological Security Based on a CA-Markov Model in Overlapped Area of Crop and Coal Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Yi Lu & Xiangrong Wang & Yujing Xie & Kun Li & Yiyang Xu, 2016. "Integrating Future Land Use Scenarios to Evaluate the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Landscape Ecological Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Qidi Dong & Linjia Wu & Jun Cai & Di Li & Qibing Chen, 2022. "Construction of Ecological and Recreation Patterns in Rural Landscape Space: A Case Study of the Dujiangyan Irrigation District in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Jian Peng & Minli Zong & Yi'na Hu & Yanxu Liu & Jiansheng Wu, 2015. "Assessing Landscape Ecological Risk in a Mining City: A Case Study in Liaoyuan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Xudan Zhou & Chenyao Hao & Yu Bao & Qiushi Zhang & Qing Wang & Wei Wang & Hongliang Guo, 2023. "Is the Urban Landscape Connected? Construction and Optimization of Urban Ecological Networks Based on Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Chen, Lili & Song, Ge & Meadows, Michael E. & Zou, Chaohui, 2018. "Spatio-temporal evolution of the early-warning status of cultivated land and its driving factors: A case study of Heilongjiang Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 280-292.
    15. Yi Liang & Dongxiao Niu & Haichao Wang & Hanyu Chen, 2017. "Assessment Analysis and Forecasting for Security Early Warning of Energy Consumption Carbon Emissions in Hebei Province, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Xiaoteng Cen & Cifang Wu & Xiaoshi Xing & Ming Fang & Zhuoma Garang & Yizhou Wu, 2015. "Coupling Intensive Land Use and Landscape Ecological Security for Urban Sustainability: An Integrated Socioeconomic Data and Spatial Metrics Analysis in Hangzhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-24, January.
    17. Fei Wang & Ning Gu, 2021. "Impact of ecological security on urban sustainability in Western China—A case study of Xi’an," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1314-1339, June.
    18. Lingling Chen & Brijesh Thapa & Jinwon Kim & Lin Yi, 2017. "Landscape Optimization in a Highly Urbanized Tourism Destination: An Integrated Approach in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Su, Kai & Yu, Qiang & Yue, Depeng & Zhang, Qibin & Yang, Lan & Liu, Zhili & Niu, Teng & Sun, Xiaoting, 2019. "Simulation of a forest-grass ecological network in a typical desert oasis based on multiple scenes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 413(C).
    20. Qian Lin & Jiaying Mao & Jiansheng Wu & Weifeng Li & Jian Yang, 2016. "Ecological Security Pattern Analysis Based on InVEST and Least-Cost Path Model: A Case Study of Dongguan Water Village," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:9:p:869-:d:76938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.