IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i3p286-d66200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning Support Systems (PSS)-Based Spatial Plan Alternatives and Environmental Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Hee-Sun Choi

    (Korea Environment Institute, 370 Sicheong-daero, Sejong City 30147, Korea)

  • Gil-Sang Lee

    (LANDRIX Research Center, 12 Samjeon-ro 1-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05579, Korea)

Abstract

Spatial planning is at the core of national land and urban development. Many countries and cities seek sustainable development through various means such as coordinated environmental planning, environmental assessment, and internalization of environmental analysis and planning. A Planning Support System (PSS) is a GIS (Geographic Information System)-based, spatial decision-making support system that incorporates a variety of theories and pertinent models. This study adopted the “What if?” model to design an alternative spatial plan that includes generation of predictive scenarios and is relatively easy to use. In the cities studied, we identified a total of six scenarios based on the main drivers of development—namely, population and spatial policies. Subsequently, we assessed the alternatives for their environmental impact, preparing sensitivity maps for each major environmental issue in the target area (natural ecosystem, air and microclimate, natural disasters). One projected advantage of the “What if?” model is that its digital visualization of proposed plans may improve public awareness and involvement. Furthermore, the tool is expected to be highly useful in ensuring the objectivity of quantitative analyses. However, it is necessary to develop a PSS that is both standardized and tailored to the particular needs of each area. Finally, the development of an e-governance system will be beneficial in ensuring public access to the decision making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Hee-Sun Choi & Gil-Sang Lee, 2016. "Planning Support Systems (PSS)-Based Spatial Plan Alternatives and Environmental Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:286-:d:66200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/286/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/286/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Cerreta & Pasquale De Toro, 2012. "Strategic Environmental Assessment of Port Plans in Italy: Experiences, Approaches, Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(11), pages 1-34, November.
    2. Hens Runhaar & Peter P J Driessen & Laila Soer, 2009. "Sustainable Urban Development and the Challenge of Policy Integration: An Assessment of Planning Tools for Integrating Spatial and Environmental Planning in the Netherlands," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 36(3), pages 417-431, June.
    3. Carolyn Harrison & Mordechai Haklay, 2002. "The Potential of Public Participation Geographic Information Systems in UK Environmental Planning: Appraisals by Active Publics," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 841-863.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Long Zhou & Yao Wu & Tom Woodfin & Rong Zhu & Tian Chen, 2018. "An Approach to Evaluate Comprehensive Plan and Identify Priority Lands for Future Land Use Development to Conserve More Ecological Values," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Yangang Xing & Phil Jones & Iain Donnison, 2017. "Characterisation of Nature-Based Solutions for the Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Silvia Tobias & Bronwyn Price, 2020. "How Effective Is Spatial Planning for Cropland Protection? An Assessment Based on Land-Use Scenarios," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Di Vaio, Assunta & Varriale, Luisa & Alvino, Federico, 2018. "Key performance indicators for developing environmentally sustainable and energy efficient ports: Evidence from Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 229-240.
    2. Saige Wang & Chenchen Zhai & Yunxiao Zhang, 2024. "Evaluating the Impact of Urban Digital Infrastructure on Land Use Efficiency Based on 279 Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Jamil Khan & Roger Hildingsson & Lisa Garting, 2020. "Sustainable Welfare in Swedish Cities: Challenges of Eco-Social Integration in Urban Sustainability Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Tikkanen, Jukka, 2018. "Participatory turn - and down-turn - in Finland's regional forest programme process," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 87-97.
    5. Joanna Badach & Elżbieta Raszeja, 2019. "Developing a Framework for the Implementation of Landscape and Greenspace Indicators in Sustainable Urban Planning. Waterfront Landscape Management: Case Studies in Gdańsk, Poznań and Bristol," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, April.
    6. Joanna Badach & Małgorzata Dymnicka & Andrzej Baranowski, 2020. "Urban Vegetation in Air Quality Management: A Review and Policy Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-28, February.
    7. Jinxing Shen & Xuejun Feng & Kai Zhuang & Tong Lin & Yan Zhang & Peifang Wang, 2019. "Vertical Distribution of Particulates within the Near-Surface Layer of Dry Bulk Port and Influence Mechanism: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Izabela Kotowska & Marta Mańkowska & Michał Pluciński, 2018. "Inland Shipping to Serve the Hinterland: The Challenge for Seaport Authorities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Raffaele Attardi & Alessandro Bonifazi & Carmelo M. Torre, 2012. "Evaluating Sustainability and Democracy in the Development of Industrial Port Cities: Some Italian Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(11), pages 1-24, November.
    10. Shih, Wan-Yu & Mabon, Leslie & Puppim de Oliveira, Jose A., 2020. "Assessing governance challenges of local biodiversity and ecosystem services: Barriers identified by the expert community," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Xia, Linlin & Zhang, Yan & Sun, Xiaoxi & Li, Jinjian, 2017. "Analyzing the spatial pattern of carbon metabolism and its response to change of urban form," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 355(C), pages 105-115.
    12. Kantola, Sini & Fagerholm, Nora & Nikula, Ari, 2023. "Utilization and implementation of PPGIS in land use planning and decision-making from the perspective of organizations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:286-:d:66200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.