IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i4p4425-4447d48216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison Analysis and Evaluation of Urban Competitiveness in Chinese Urban Clusters

Author

Listed:
  • Haixiang Guo

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Research Center for Digital Business Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Xiao Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yijing Li

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Deyun Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Research Center for Digital Business Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Xiaohong Chen

    (School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

With accelerating urbanization, urban competitiveness has become a worldwide academic focus. Previous studies always focused on economic factors but ignored social elements when measuring urban competitiveness. In this paper, a city was considered as a whole containing different units such as departments, individuals and economic activities, which interact with each other and affect its economic operation. Moreover, a city’s development was compared to an object’s movement, and the components were compared to different forces acting upon the object. With the analysis of the principle of object movement, this study has established a more scientific evaluation index system that involves 4 subsystems, 12 elements and 58 indexes. By using the TOPSIS method, the study has worked out the urban competitiveness of 141 cities from 28 Chinese urban clusters in 2009. According to the calculation results, these cities were divided into four levels: A, B, C, D. Furthermore, in order to analyze the competitiveness of cities and urban clusters, cities and urban clusters have been divided into four groups according to their distributive characteristics: the southeast, the northeast and Bohai Rim, the central region and the west. Suggestions and recommendations for each group are provided based on careful analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Haixiang Guo & Xiao Liu & Yijing Li & Deyun Wang & Xiaohong Chen, 2015. "Comparison Analysis and Evaluation of Urban Competitiveness in Chinese Urban Clusters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:4425-4447:d:48216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/4/4425/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/4/4425/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niusha Esmaeilpoorarabi & Tan Yigitcanlar & Mirko Guaralda, 2016. "Place quality and urban competitiveness symbiosis? A position paper," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 4-21.
    2. Fan Zhang & Xiyang Lou & Yuemin Ning, 2021. "The comparative study of China's mega‐city regions: A perspective of competitiveness," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 425-442, March.
    3. Weiwei Li & Pingtao Yi & Danning Zhang, 2018. "Sustainability Evaluation of Cities in Northeastern China Using Dynamic TOPSIS-Entropy Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Malin Song & Qianjiao Xie, 2021. "Evaluation of Urban Competitiveness of the Huaihe River Eco-Economic Belt Based on Dynamic Factor Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 58(3), pages 615-639, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:4425-4447:d:48216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.