IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i12p15797-15966d59791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Google TV or Apple TV?—The Reasons for Smart TV Failure and a User-Centered Strategy for the Success of Smart TV

Author

Listed:
  • Jungwoo Shin

    (Environmental Policy Research Group, Korea Environment Institute, 370 Sicheong-daero, Sejong-si 339-007, Korea)

  • Yuri Park

    (Department of ICT Industry Research, Korea Information Society Development Institute, 18 Jeongtong-ro, Deoksan-myeon, Jincheon-gun, Chungcheongbuk-do 27872, Korea)

  • Daeho Lee

    (Department of Interaction Science, Sungkyunkwan University, 25-2 Sungkyunkwan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-745, Korea)

Abstract

Traditional television (TV) has evolved into smart TV in terms of both hardware and software. However, compared with smart phones and tablet PCs, which are huge successes in the market, smart TV has grown more slowly than the market expected and has not really changed the TV market. In this study, we investigate reasons for the failure of smart TV from consumer perspectives. We use conjoint analysis to collect stated preference data from consumers. Our analysis consists of two parts: analyzing consumer preferences for six attributes of smart TVs and examining the effects of socio-demographic and behavioral information on purchase intention for a smart TV. Based on the estimation results from the first part, we find that consumers set a higher value on the traditional characteristics of TV than on the functions of smart TV. Thus, smart TV does not have key functions to encourage its adoption over traditional TV. From the second part of our analysis, we identify which factor is most important to increase purchase intention for a smart TV. Based on our results, we can suggest the direction of market strategies about how to cross the chasm of smart TV.

Suggested Citation

  • Jungwoo Shin & Yuri Park & Daeho Lee, 2015. "Google TV or Apple TV?—The Reasons for Smart TV Failure and a User-Centered Strategy for the Success of Smart TV," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:12:p:15797-15966:d:59791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/12/15797/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/12/15797/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heetae Yang & Hwansoo Lee, 0. "Exploring user acceptance of streaming media devices: an extended perspective of flow theory," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-27.
    2. Heetae Yang & Hwansoo Lee, 2018. "Exploring user acceptance of streaming media devices: an extended perspective of flow theory," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-27, February.
    3. Fahim Ullah & Samad M. E. Sepasgozar & Changxin Wang, 2018. "A Systematic Review of Smart Real Estate Technology: Drivers of, and Barriers to, the Use of Digital Disruptive Technologies and Online Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-44, September.
    4. Woojae Kim & Sungmin Ko & Myoungjin Oh & Ie-jung Choi & Jungwoo Shin, 2019. "Is an Incentive Policy for Energy Efficient Products Effective for Air Purifiers? The Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Xing Wan & Javier Cenamor & Jing Chen, 2017. "Exploring Performance Determinants of China’s Cable Operators and OTT Service Providers in the Era of Digital Convergence—From the Perspective of an Industry Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:12:p:15797-15966:d:59791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.