IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v5y2013i5p1893-1916d25385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mature Hybrid Poplar Riparian Buffers along Farm Streams Produce High Yields in Response to Soil Fertility Assessed Using Three Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Julien Fortier

    (Fiducie de recherche sur la forêt des Cantons-de-l'Est / Eastern Townships Forest Research Trust, 1 rue Principale, Saint-Benoît-du-Lac J0B 2M0, Canada
    Département des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 8888 succ. Centre-ville, Montréal H3C 3P8, Canada)

  • Benoit Truax

    (Fiducie de recherche sur la forêt des Cantons-de-l'Est / Eastern Townships Forest Research Trust, 1 rue Principale, Saint-Benoît-du-Lac J0B 2M0, Canada)

  • Daniel Gagnon

    (Fiducie de recherche sur la forêt des Cantons-de-l'Est / Eastern Townships Forest Research Trust, 1 rue Principale, Saint-Benoît-du-Lac J0B 2M0, Canada
    Département des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 8888 succ. Centre-ville, Montréal H3C 3P8, Canada
    Department of Biology, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina S4S 0A2, Canada)

  • France Lambert

    (Fiducie de recherche sur la forêt des Cantons-de-l'Est / Eastern Townships Forest Research Trust, 1 rue Principale, Saint-Benoît-du-Lac J0B 2M0, Canada)

Abstract

This study had three main objectives: (1) to evaluate the aboveground biomass and volume yield of three unrelated hybrid poplar clones in 9 year-old riparian buffer strips located on four farms of southern Québec, Canada; (2) to compare yield data at 9 years with previous data (at 6 years); (3) to evaluate how soil fertility, measured using three different soil testing methods (soil nutrient stocks, soil nutrient concentrations, soil nutrient supply rates), is related to yield. Across the four sites, hybrid poplar productivity after 9 years ranged from 116 to 450 m 3 ha −1 , for stem wood volume, and from 51 to 193 megagrams per hectare (Mg ha −1 ), for woody dry biomass. High volume and woody dry biomass yields (26.3 to 49.9 m 3 ha −1 yr -1 , and 11.4 to 21.4 Mg ha −1 yr -1 ) were observed at the three most productive sites. From year 6 to 9, relatively high yield increases (8.9−15.1 m 3 ha −1 yr −1 ) were observed at all sites, but the productivity gap between the less fertile site and the three other sites was widened. Clone MxB-915311 was the most productive across the four sites, while clone DxN-3570 was the least productive. However, at the most productive site, clone MxB-915311 experienced severe stem and branch breakages. Independently of the soil testing method used, available soil P was always the first soil factor explaining volume yield.

Suggested Citation

  • Julien Fortier & Benoit Truax & Daniel Gagnon & France Lambert, 2013. "Mature Hybrid Poplar Riparian Buffers along Farm Streams Produce High Yields in Response to Soil Fertility Assessed Using Three Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:5:y:2013:i:5:p:1893-1916:d:25385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/5/1893/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/5/1893/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bull, Gary Q. & Bazett, Michael & Schwab, Olaf & Nilsson, Sten & White, Andy & Maginnis, Stewart, 2006. "Industrial forest plantation subsidies: Impacts and implications," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 13-31, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ferrarini, Andrea & Serra, Paolo & Almagro, María & Trevisan, Marco & Amaducci, Stefano, 2017. "Multiple ecosystem services provision and biomass logistics management in bioenergy buffers: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 277-290.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Korhonen, J. & Zhang, Y. & Toppinen, A., 2016. "Examining timberland ownership and control strategies in the global forest sector," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 39-46.
    2. Locatelli, Bruno & Rojas, Varinia & Salinas, Zenia, 2008. "Impacts of payments for environmental services on local development in northern Costa Rica: A fuzzy multi-criteria analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 275-285, April.
    3. Dennis Gain & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2017. "Expert Evaluation of Subsidies for the Management of Fragmented Private Forest in Regards to National Biodiversity Goals—The Case of Kochi Prefecture, Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Lubna Ali & Rizwan Akhtar & Jamal Hussain & Ghazala Khan & Sameena Mumtaz & Naila Akhtar & Rashid Ali & Chenlu Tao, 2024. "Economic Performance of Forest Plantations in Asian Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4997-5017, March.
    5. Xi Yu & Xiyang Yin & Yuying Liu & Dongmei Li, 2021. "Do Agricultural Machinery Services Facilitate Land Transfer? Evidence from Rice Farmers in Sichuan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Afonso, Roberta & Miller, Daniel C., 2021. "Forest plantations and local economic development: Evidence from Minas Gerais, Brazil," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Bopp, Carlos & Engler, Alejandra & Jara-Rojas, Roberto & Arriagada, Rodrigo, 2020. "Are forest plantation subsidies affecting land use change and off-farm income? A farm-level analysis of Chilean small forest landowners," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Markus Kröger, 2012. "The Expansion of Industrial Tree Plantations and Dispossession in Brazil," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(4), pages 947-973, July.
    9. Chuang, Tsai-Jen & Yen, Tian-Ming, 2017. "Public views on the value of forests in relation to forestation projects—A case study in central Taiwan," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 173-179.
    10. España, F. & Arriagada, R. & Melo, O. & Foster, W., 2022. "Forest plantation subsidies: Impact evaluation of the Chilean case," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    11. Rode, Rafael & Leite, Helio Garcia & Silva, Márcio Lopes da & Ribeiro, Carlos Antonio Álvares Soares & Binoti, Daniel Henrique Breda, 2014. "The economics and optimal management regimes of eucalyptus plantations: A case study of forestry outgrower schemes in Brazil," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 26-33.
    12. Xu, Yunan, 2019. "Rethinking the politics of land-use change: Insights from the rise of the industrial tree plantation sector in Southern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    13. Arvola, Anne & Brockhaus, Maria & Kallio, Maarit & Pham, Thu Thuy & Chi, Dao Thi Linh & Long, Hoang Tuan & Nawir, Ani Adiwinata & Phimmavong, Somvang & Mwamakimbullah, Reuben & Jacovelli, Paul, 2020. "What drives smallholder tree growing? Enabling conditions in a changing policy environment," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    14. Masiero, Mauro & Secco, Laura & Pettenella, Davide & Brotto, Lucio, 2015. "Standards and guidelines for forest plantation management: A global comparative study," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 29-44.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:5:y:2013:i:5:p:1893-1916:d:25385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.